MUSIC. The SOUND PROJECT.
The current 'Paul McCartney' has stated in interviews that he is NOT the original Paul and that there are two 'Paul McCartneys'.
Tik Tok a few seconds.
He appears to have legally changed his name to the same name, and in his original identity, he actually was right alongside The Beatles in Germany (he speaks German possibly quite fluently) and for at least their North America tours since 1965 and probably their first tour there. This means he can legitimately remember back to the 'early days'. This fortunate circumstance may well have been planned from the beginning, because the killing of Paul McCartney was already planned. I cannot help but wonder how involved in this Billy, the replacement, was.
The problem is that the general public take no notice of this and choose to believe he is the same person. For this reason it has made it possible to get away with a massive deception, and a crime. This person has taken over the entire identity of the real Paul, and everything that he owned, making the original Paul almost seem never to have existed.
I do not wish to support anything to do with the 'fake Paul' even though he contributed some good songs. It is clear that the focus of the work after 1967 has been on the replacement's work, and diminished all the original Beatles. It become all about the replacement man.
This is The Beatles with founding band member Paul McCartney who took the group to mega stardom and ouzed charisma and charm. . It is a different person from the later photos after 1966. I wanted to use a different video for the music track, but it had mixed in film of 'fake Paul', and once you know it is mostly quite easy to tell which those are. I do not want to support the 'fake Paul' - who has SAID he was asked to join the band. He has said he is not the original Paul McCartney, and there are a few interviews which prove this. So what are we supposed to believe, when he himself has said he was asked to join the band? It is time to drop the 'silly rumour' response and look at the reality.
I am not going to ignore the later work of The Beatles from 1967, but I am going to look at the work of the real, original Beatles members, not the replacement. I think their contribution has been diminished by what happened, and deliberately placed secondary to the work of the replacement, and that 'replacemnt Paul' has usurped (taken over) the enormous appeal and success of The Beatles for himself.
In most ways 'replacement Paul' did a great job, even excellent, and had he kept to what he was supposed to do, he would have been a hero.
But he didn't. He tried to takeover the group, from the moment the ink was dry on the contract, and it was apparent even from his first appearance in December 1966. He used his position as replacement in sensitive circumstances, to abuse that trust. By the time they broke up, he should have faded away as 'Paul' and continued the career he wanted under another name, including his own real name. He did use other names such as Vivian Stansfield and created some other band attempts under different names, but they did not bring him the adultation and success that Paul McCartney's name did.
He absolutely should not have formed the band Wings with himself as the leader using Paul McCartney's name. That is a deception and a crime. I don't know the name of the crime, but he is not the actual Paul McCartney people think he is. As a person he is shallow. His 'little love songs' have none of the depth of the real Paul McCartney's 'Here, There, and Everywhere'. He was someone without a higher integrity, and this is now muddying the image of the real Paul McCartney who was not going behind his almost fiancee Jane Asher's back with any number of trashy pick-ups and a number of additional regular girlfriends.
In doing this research I did look into the possibility that Jane, as an actress, was basically a cover as girlfriend.
I did discover that this 'Paul' had done some bad things against the other Beatles, cheating and not so good behaviour, so all possibilities were on the table to investigate. The research indicates two different people as 'Paul'.
In fact, when the real Paul McCartney appears to have been murdered in a forced car accident, and then what happened straight after that. At that time, he was on the top of the world with his career, the world was at his feet. He was only 24 years old, happily in love with Jane, and with a fantastic dream lifetime ahead of him. All of that was taken from him in an horrific satanic murder which began by taking out his eye, and then slicing his head with an axe. That is, according to the research of Richard Balducci and the evidence of the actual autopsy photograph also included on Fake Paul McCartney's video for 1882. There is also, elsewhere, a photograph of the accident scene befire being taken to the morgue.
For the record, The Beatles were always in the order they joined the band, so it was John, Paul, George and Ringo. In all public appearances over the last 20+ years Ringo always takes precedence over Fake Paul.
The Beatles were the first band to experiment with different sounds and formats.
That was at least from 1966. They were ahead of Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin who began a bit later. (Led Zeppelin didn't really experiment with other sounds and techniques.) The Beatles' compositions are exactly that, complete structured songs/music - actual 'compositions' - which means it is developed music, with a complex structure to it.
MUSIC. I am now going to include a George Harrison track because it's very good. I didn't know any of them before. This is good. In fact I am going through some of the albums and the stuff is good. This is a rock track, but another track will be completely different, Indian sounding, then something else.
Here is another track I have always liked, from Revolver Watch Video.
I wanted to use a different video but it has mixed in film of 'fake Paul', and once you know it is mostly quite easy to tell which those are. I do not want to support the 'fake Paul' - who has SAID he was asked to join the band. He has said he is not the original Paul McCartney, and there are a few interviews which prove this. So what are we supposed to believe, when he himself has said he was asked to join the band? It is time to drop the 'silly rumour' and look at the reality.
I do have to say that in listening to the later albums with 'fake Paul' the work is still very good. But it is not because this man has joined the band. The real original Beatles are still there, and the songs are produced as Beatles tracks. It is still The Beatles but with a replacment band member.
Many groups lost members and then had replacements. In most cases those bands with replacements, still maintain their particular 'sound' and continue on. This is the same thing. The Beatles continue with the their 'sound'. After 1966 there are many new songs from Lennon and Harrison. They are still The Beatles. 'Replacement Paul' also contributed some songs.
Yet it is also clear that as soon as the 'ink was dry from signing the papers' this person began to take over. The 'Sgt. Pepper' album is his project and The Beatles apparently have to go along with it. They said in interviews, all three of them, that they were not very interested in that album. They make a point of saying it. It is their first album with Paul's replacement so was it part of the deal, the paper's they signed, that this album would be recorded? However, it is clear that the replacement has pretty much taken control of the group from the start - and that was not in the agreement. The fact that he did the ITV interview in January 1967 shows his new found dominance. The brief interview in December 1966 does too. Why? Because he should have just been low profile as The Beatles became a studio band. His role was to be a musician in the group, but look as if the real Paul was still around. The replacement had been in a 'Merseybeat' band called 'Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots'.
There is something extremely disturbing, about this man actually pretending to be the original Paul McCartney.
The Beatles could not have carried out any idea to keep quiet about what had happened to Paul McCartney without it coming from British Intelligence and from the Crown. The media would not have kept the story quiet. In signing the new guy into the band he had the legal go ahead to be there. But his hold over the band was that they had agreed for him to 'be' Paul McCartney. The replacement seemed to know he had that power from the start.
Paul's replacement, Billy, has said that he is a replacement, and the real problem here may be that the Beatles fans have not taken enough notice, or chose to ignore that. 'Replacement Paul' can legitimately say 'Well I have told you that. You chose not to believe me!"
The Tik Tok link does tell you, by the man himself, that he is not the original Paul McCartney. He clearly says he was asked to join the Beatles, the group was already formed, it was already the 'best band in the world' - so this is not Paul McCartney. Paul created The Beatles with John after they were both in the Quarry Men from 1957. This is not the original Paul McCartney, even if he has changed his name legally to that. 'Faul's' ex wife Heather Mills found a suitcase with information (quite possibly the diaries of the roadie Mal Evans. He is the one who travelled with Billy to Kenya in Nov. 1966.) Tik Tok a few seconds.
This man should have done the right thing and just made it seem that Paul was still around, and waited a few years for when it was safer to announce he had died. After that, this man, Billy Shepherd, should have then returned to his own identity and pursued his music career if that is what he wanted to do. Instead he took on the identity of someone who had been a legend, took his house, the things that belonged to Paul (which should have gone to his family) and pretended to be the original Paul McCartney. For sure, he not only changed his looks with plastic surgery but also changed his name. This is what is wrong.
He should not have done the ITV interview in January 1967 and that is the first indication that right from the start, this man exploited this situation.. Certainly he was asked (as he himself says) to join The Beatles and that was in September 1966. He then became a 'pain in the neck' for the actual remaining Beatles. This tells us he did exploit the situation, and maybe he already knew that this is how things were going to go, that something would happen to Paul, and he would replace him. It does look as if that is the case. After taking over The Beatles from 1967 it then went to the formation of the business Apple Corps where in an extraordinary interview which demonstrates the ego of this man, he is sitting in a chair much higher that John Lennon for an important interview.
I basically only knew about the 'Paul is dead' thing from when I first did some Beatles research in 2019. I had watched the person called 'Paul McCartney' on one of those fund raiser band events and he climbed up onto a piano to be higher than all the big names on that stage, and was waving his arms around to be noticed, like an egotistical, narcissistic jerk. "Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental health condition in which people have an unreasonably high sense of their own importance. They need and seek too much attention and want people to admire them. People with this disorder may lack the ability to understand or care about the feelings of others." I think that fits very nicely. I do not like this person. However, I do like Paul McCartney very much.
The linked page on the Paul McCartney research 'Lead in to a Murder'
I have not yet downloaded the book 'Memoirs of Billy Shears' but expect to do so. I do not feel quite ready to do that yet. This man should not be pretending he is the same person from before 1967. Paul was very attractive, good looking, really cute, loads of charisma etc and this other man was not that. 'Fake paul' maybe wrote some good songs, but that should not mean the real Paul McCartney and his legacy have been forgotten.
This needs to be properly investigated.
The Beatles were used and abused by the satanic run music industry.
It was as if they were hated for their charisma and success and targeted to be slowly and literally murdered off - first Paul in a ritual killing, then John by being shot (from the front by the doorman who was CIA, not by Mark Chapman), Then George was targeted in a near fatal stabbing which also may have instigated his cancer.
.gif)
Billy admits many times that he replaced Paul McCartney in 1966
Watch Video 3 minutes. Paul met John in 1957 and they set up The Quarrymen then the Beatles together. Paul was 15 when he met John which 'fake Paul' gets wrong in an interview not added in this compilation. Also notice how very old his voice sounds because Billy is a few years older than Paul was.
In going through the 'Revolver' album The Beatles were clearly 'moving in a new direction' and that was in June 1966.
So the interview with 'fake Paul' in December 1966 and followed up in January where this miserble sob complains about not being able to 'progress' and 'move forward' is nonsense. This is just an observation and comment, because the album is definitely 'moving forward', while their final live concert at the end of August 1966 was mostly their previous stuff. Unfortunately I did not know all the tracks on that album, but I think maybe a year ago, while doing the 'Sound Project' I found this one, which I really like - but don't tell me this was not 'moving forward'! Watch Video
Everything described as 'replacement Paul's' personality and behaviour in the recordings sessions -
such as mentioned below but also that he was picky and drove everyone mad with it - sounds like someone whose birthdate made him a Virgo. This irritable pickiness is also how he is described to this day, current, by all who are his staff or work for him which includes musicians. Paul McCartney was a Gemini. For this reason I thought I should check that, and guess what, 'replacement Paul' was born on September 9th - which makes him a Virgo. This is a zodiac sign that can be nit picking, and never satisfied, and certainly a personality type that the 'self-thinking' other Beatles would not particularly relate to.
Here are some photos of William before he had the ongoing surgery to make him look more like Paul. Watch Video. The 1X X1 Files. This person is certainly the person in the Dec. 20th 1966 interview, and the January 1967 ITV interview which followed.(As new 'points' turn up, they will be added on the correct pages dealing with this research.) (Kenya is not in Spain!!) There is also an Italian video which has compared the guitar playing from 1966 and after 1966 with inexplicable differences, which is now added.
"'Paul"... You're Playing Yesterday Wrong! Again!' - RECOMMENDED.
Watch Video. Fulvio Lepore. The points raised in this video are molto bene - very good indicators of a different person playing the guitar. Very, molto bene! The person presenting this video also compares the use of the same 'fake Paul' style with how another later acoustic guitar song 'Blackbird' is played. same person same style. But not the style of the original and real Paul. It is also not an evolution of the style.
Another real issue here is that Paul McCartney was loved,and is an icon. The people need to know that the person they loved, died in 1966.
Paul deserves to be buried under his own name.
As things are, a 'fake Paul' will be buried under that name and the real Paul forgotten and never acknowledged.
NEW. Everything described as 'replacement Paul's' personality and behaviour in the recordings sessions - such as mentioned below but also that he was picky and drove everyone mad with it - sounds like someone whose birthdate made him a Virgo. This irritable pickiness is also how he is described to this day, current, by all who are his staff or work for him which includes musicians. Paul McCartney was a Gemini. For this reason I thought I should check that, and guess what, 'replacement Paul' was born on September 9th - which makes him a Virgo. This is a zodiac sign that can be nit picking, and never satisfied, and certainly a personality type that 'self-thinking' other Beatles would not particularly relate to. Here are some photos of William before he had the incremental ongoing surgery to make him look more like Paul. Watch Video. The 1X X1 Files.
This person is certainly the person in the Dec. 20th 1966 interview, and the January 1967 ITV interview which followed. (As now 'points' turn up, they will be added on the correct pages dealng with this research.) (Kenya is not in Spain!) There is also an Italian video which has compared the guitar playing from 1966 and after 1966 with inexplicable differences, which is now added.
'Paul... You're Playing Yesterday Wrong! Again!' Watch Video. The points raised in this video are very good indicators of a different person. The person presenting this video also compares the use of the same 'fake Paul' style with how another later acoustic guitar song 'Blackbird' 1968 is played. same person same style. But not the style of the original and real Paul. It is also not an evolution of the style. (Full version of this excellent observation.)
'TIME'. Why the 3 remaining real Beatles did not want to work with the 'fake Paul' 'Fake Paul' has said in interviews that he is not the original Paul McCartney. Read More.
