MUSIC. The SOUND PROJECT.
Thanks to the research of Richard Balducci, and the autopsy photograph, we know the real Paul McCartney, after the forced car crash, was struck 3 times on the head with a specific Celtic hammer/axe made of silver, as part of a satanic pagan ritual.
The page is actually researching a possible murder, but is going back to when the 'social engineering' and 'mind control' programming for the current world really took off.
Perhaps the first thing to ask is WHY is and was there a rumour 'Paul is dead' in the first place?
People often think it began in 1969 and took off - because someone at a uni in the USA looked at the Sgt. Pepper album cover. At the same time, there had been a song released in the USA by someone who had just been to the Beatles' 'Apple' company in London about a record contract. He returned without a contract but with a song about 'something not right about Paul. He recorded the track on his own label and it was a regional hit, which also reached a pop radio station which reached the uni that triggered the question.
But this is also something that happened in 1966 which was announced on the TV as 'breaking news' in 1966,
then the story was not repeated. It is not just a rumour, or based on vague symbolic indications of a death. It was on the TV News, 3 years earlier. It was also a magazine article not long afterwards. Then nothing said again. There is a bizarre album cover that looks as if Paul died, but nobody says that, and there was no reaction like that. So why was it announced in 1966?
There are many points that indicate this is not the same person. In which case we are looking at a deception. And much more.
The question is, is Paul McCartney of The Beatles, the same person as the person known by that name today?
From researching the 'Paul' from 1967, it would be doubtful that he would care much for the type of girl that Jane Asher was. She would not seem to be his type at all. He was out and about, with several girlfriends on the go at the same time. In trying to find the right description, the most apt is that he was with the type of girls who 'got around' not at all like Jane Asher. In fact he had met Linda in 1967 (officially) and despite that it was 'love at first sight' he was also still seeing Maggie who has recently written a book about it, and another girl Francie, who also wrote a book about it, and Linda was a groupie. Yet if you listen to this song. 'Here, There. and Everywhere', this is about a really nice and meaningful relationship.
This page is actually researching a possible murder, but is going back to when the programming for the current world really took off.
There are links to where the earlier points were covered.
Some of these points include the gradual slander of the remaining 3 real Beatles. In fact the unfolding story indicates someone who did step in to cover as 'Paul' while the 3 Beatles continued as a studio band. The reasons for that are covered in the other pages, but one co-incidence is that it all happened just as the Beatles had lost the rights to the income from their own work. In a 'bigger picture' that may have been intentionally part of the entire set-up that led to needing a cover for 'Paul'. This guy did not honour his agreement at all. He continued into his own career under that name and undoubtedly did legally change his identity and already claimed everything that was the real Paul's - right down to the photographs he found that Paul had taken with black and white film at the dawn of the phenomenon that became the Beatles. Many people have noted the change in persoanlity etc and common descriptions are 'narcistic' and a sociopath.
When dealing with a sociopath, they can be very charming, and clever in the devious way that criminals and lesser level people believe is 'superiour intelligence'. The current 'Paul' is not charming or charismatic. He is riding the wave of a unique and incredible reputation established by someone else about 60 years ago. The original and true Paul McCartney deserves to have the true legacy that belongs to him.
In late 1966 The Beatles had just completed a successful tour of North America,
despite controversy over John Lennon's comment that The Beatles were 'more popular than Jesus'. It was a comment on the over the top adoration they were receiving, not that they were in some way 'better' than Jesus! But as always, the American public of the time missed the point. They returned to the UK to take a 12 week break. This was the time, the year after they had been 'advised' to take their song writing company public. They had agreed that everything would be shared equally, but by late 1966 and with Northern Songs having gone public, they discovered they had lost control of their songs and therefore royalties. There is no doubt that they had people around them more than willing to screw these young guys out of their earnings.
This same timing is also when Paul McCartney was in a car accident. It was seven days after his last ever public appearance at a Music Award show. It is not unusual that a car accident would happen, because it does happen, and people do die. In this case, it involved the most popular man on the planet. British Intelligence and the government made the decision that this should not be made public knowledge. It could not have happened without that level of cover. It was announced on the TV news once, in the UK and in the USA, then nothing more. Later investigations and an actual video for the song '1882' by the 'replacement Paul', indicate not only that the real Paul was killed, but that it was not because of the car crash. It had involved a 'satanic ritual'. The car crash had been forced. The video, by the current 'Paul' shows the autopsy photo. Surely a strange thing to place in a video? The injuries are consistent with having been hit with a particular type of axe used in rituals. Thus we look at the song 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'.
There are things that need to be looked into.
Some of the topic of the killing of the real Paul McCartney in 1966 which was on this page has now been moved to "Why the 3 remaining real Beatles did not want to work with the 'fake Paul' (Time). Much of the unfolding story which follows the appearance of a major tragedy, death or murder in September 1966, ends up with John Lennon and George Harrison looking churlish, petty, and other negatives which are ostensibly about 'business differences'. But knowing the true story - the 'bigger picture' - explains why the real Beatles did not want to work with the 'fake Paul'. Or if he is still the same person, then the 'greatly changed Paul'.
After The Beatles did their last concert of the North America Tour on August 29th 1966 they had a 3 month holiday break.
This is a new point. They returned to the UK at the end of August, and John Lennon soon left for Germany to begin filming 'How I Won the War' for 6 weeks. He was not at the Music Award show on Sept. 6th, the week before the car accident took place. Presumably filming in Gemany, then Spain was going to be an interesting thing to do, and a break for 6 weeks. Yet shortly afterwards Ringo Starr goes down to Spain where John is filming, to be with him because he was 'lonely'. Like all of the band, Ringo was enjoying his holiday with his wife and recently born son. But he goes to be with John in a situation that sounds much more like being there for a friend in mourning.
The story includes the fact that this replacement person's ex-wife Heather FOUND the information on this. There are also a few more untimely deaths connected to this too, including the roadie Mal Evans.
Thanks to the research of Richard Balducci, and the autopsy photograph, we know the real Paul McCartney, after the forced car crash, was struck 3 times on the head with a specific Celtic hammer/axe made of silver, as part of a satanic pagan ritual.
Fake Paul wanted this murder track to be released as a single,
'Maxwell's Silver Hammer',
and it should be mentioned that the nutjob satanists love to decieve, flaunt their deceptions, and love to display their 'successes' in everyone's face. Had this been released as a single, then everyone would have been thoughtlessly participating in a jaunty singalong song about, or is a very similar topic, to the real Paul's death.
What's The Story Behind 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'? The psychopathic story of a murderer.
This is about that song with some interesting and observant 'comedy' commentary. This is a very sick song. Watch Video.
The current topic is The Beatles and Paul McCartney. This is a song I wanted to add because of the feature on the real Paul McCartney. This is Paul's song for Jane which he recorded when he was 23 on The Beatles last album together 'Revolver' which I decided to listen through. Jane was 20 They had been together since just before Jane's seventeenth birthday. In June 1966 Paul was Jane had moved into Paul's new house in St. John's Wood, London, still living together, and they were going to marry.
FEATURED TRACK - 'Here, There and Everywhere'
Watch Video 'Here, There and Everywhere' (Paul's song for Jane).
By the way, this is what loving someone should be.
"To lead a better life I need my love to be here Here, making each day of the year Changing my life with a wave of her hand Nobody can deny that there's something there There, running my hands through her hair Both of us thinking how good it can be Someone is speaking But she doesn't know he's there I want her everywhere And if she's beside me I know I need never care But to love her is to need her everywhere Knowing that love is to share Each one believing that love never dies Watching her eyes and hoping I'm always there I want her everywhere And if she's beside me I know I need never care But to love her is to need her everywhere Knowing that love is to share Each one believing that love never dies Watching her eyes and hoping I'm always there. I will be there And everywhere Here, there and everywhere."
NEW The real Paul's song for Jane is a very beautiful love song, and not just 'beautiful' but is speaking about something very special. Yet this is supposed to be the same person who wrote the psychotic lyrics in a jolly little song about murdering someone with an axe. (Which raises a question about how he knew about it, doesn't it.)
Those who gravitate to the Luciferian mindset, like the 'coneheads', and those who have been indoctrinated from childhood, do not have the ability for empathy, compassion and feeling, the kind of feeling humans have the ability for, and also astrologically, a very 'water sign' ability.
In a youtube video, the current 'fake Paul' claims this is his favourite Beatles song, as if was for John Lennon, and obviously it was for the real Paul. The song captures something that real humans will automatically understand, but those programmed into the current sex motivated lifestyle will not. In 'fake Paul's' decription of this song, he does not understand it! He compares it to a style from the 30's or '40's and completely misses what the real Paul is actually saying in this lovely song. Isn't that interesting! The song is actually not like the style he says. Those of today's world also do not know or understand that relationships are not just about sex. They don't know that. There is 'something else' to look for, something more, and more valuable. Something that most now do not have the ability to understand.They cannot feel it.
This page is looking at more points that don't add up.
The Beatles throughout their career to 1966 were entirely positive and a powerful influence for good.
Maybe this topic has to become a book, but more hopefully it will motivate others to do some research too. 'Fake Paul' very much seems to be a sociopath. There is just so much that does not feel right, about this.
For example, does it seem likely that he would be writing something as meaningful as the song for Jane, and at the same time meeting another woman named Maggie - who was a girlfriend (of Billy's) from 1966 to 1968 - and telling her he was going behind Jane's back and didn't want her to find this out, so keep the affair very quiet? Is this the type of person the real Paul McCartney was? In a significant romance with a very nice girl, and yet he would go behind her back to sleep with a number of girls who 'got around', and of a very different type to Jane? I don't think so, and a lot of this situation is slandering and tarnishing the real Paul. Something is definitely wrong
The 'Paul McCartney' issue looks like a number of very real crimes were commited here.
We know for a fact that "Paul" did do something that cheated the other Beatles and it ended up with him getting more money than the rest of the Beatles. He became a billionaire, and that was long before he ever obtained the royalty rights back supposedly in 2017. The only way he could have done that is because he already had more royalties. And yet he probably would have made so much more had he continued as they had been, with him being very likeable. Why would he change so much, in looks, personality, viewpoints, and behaviour, from early September 1966 to mid-December 1966? He would become a shallow, money grabbing individual willing to cheat the other Beatles for his own gain, cheat on his girlfriend, and throw away his loving bond and friendship with the other Beatles? *From what I can see, Paul was a down to earth 'good lad' brought up with solid values, who would always put family first and value love and friendship.
I also checked the videos of song tracks for after 1966, and while the studio recordings do sound like The Beatles, and are okay, the videos are definitely off. I didn't know there were any videos of some of the tracks from 1967 but there are. Everything they did from 1967 was "'Paul's' idea" starting with Sgt. Pepper which is all about death and drugs, and then the TV film Magical Mystery Tour which was not much of a success even though the music was. The film lacks the energy and charisma of their earlier films, it is lacklustre, and this would appear to be because 'fake Paul' has none of the charisma, and also because the remaining three real Beatles don't like him, and if something did happen to Paul, they would also still be grieving for him, and now have this jerk portraying him, which they have to go along with. The reason is because they agreed to it. At the very least, something happened which made Paul a very different character.
Looking at the video for 'Hello, Goodbye' it is almost like an early AI recontruction of Paul with his face superimposed
over the person (Billy) who was actually there for this. To me, it does look odd, particularly when you look for this. His neck and head in some angles seem added onto the body. Also George's face seems to say it all! (He's in the salmon colour). It is like the finished version of the 'Paul' character was added afterwards. It probably requires one viewing watching George's face, and another looking at 'Paul'.
Watch Video.
.gif)
Why the 3 remaining Beatles did not want to do the Sgt. Pepper album.
The general story put out (by 'fake Paul') about the work from 1967 onwards and the 1967 Sgt.Pepper album is that John and George partcularly, were being too apathetic to get on with recording a new album and 'fake Paul' had to become the leader to make them work.
This image definitely casts Lennon and Harrison in a bad light. In reality, they were in mourning for the real Paul, and this 'fake version' had taken the situation of being the 'new Paul' and it had given him the right to 'rule and take charge of The Beatles. They could not say anything, they had signed official documents. They did not want to work with this person, they did not like him, they were grieving for the real Paul and here was someone who was now pretending to be the person they loved. This is another reason why the truth needs to be made known. Saying these things is slandering the real Beatles.
They were not being petty about 'business matters' although those issues were serious. They were stuck in a terrible and emotionally devastating situation - and could not dislose why.
The album is great because it is produced and mixed as a Beatles album and because of the contribution by John.
It is the John Lennon tracks which stand out, like 'Lucy in the Sky', ''Mr Kite', and 'Day in the Life'.Also Harrison's 'Within You and Without You'. In Lennon's later solo song 'How do You Sleep' his introducing words are "So Sgt. Pepper took you by surprise". Most of the really great tracks on Sgt. Pepper were John's even though the 3 real Beatles expressed no liking for the album, and it was a 'fake Paul's' project.
Why the 3 remaining real Beatles did not want to work with the 'fake Paul'
Much of this looks as if the fake Paul is making The Beatles' legacy all about him.
I would like to show a short video that someone has compiled which features Paul, and if you just focus on the fun of the music and stage performance of basically a club or pub band who play entertaining rock and roll - not the timeframe of the '60's - then you will see how appealing, charismatic, and nice the real Paul McCartney was. Watch Video. I came across this recently and the performance shown always makes me smile. It is 'feel good' and positive. This is the original and real Paul. The fake Paul, never exhibits any of this charisma.
*I also found a video where 'Paul' is in normal conversation but it is not the Liverpudlian accent that is usually heard. I have to find that to check it again.
*Another video from a Howard Stern Show interview where he is really rubbishing the remaining 3 real Beatles. Obviously Howard Stern was given this story by 'Paul' What was 'Paul' thinking releasing his solo album at the same time as The Beatles. Watch Video. 1+minute
I have found photos of 'Paul' and Jane which have been photo-shopped with 'fake Paul'. Some faked pictures are on the John, Paul, George and Ringo page. The video clip of the full version of 'Now and Then' done earlier disappeared from the internet the same day as the release - but luckily someone else put a copy of it back up. And I found interviews which make the remaining Beatles' seem not so nice, including a 1 min interview with Howard Stern which I have added.
On Sept. 16th 1966 there was a meeting in Paris
between Lennon, 'Paul' and Brian Epstein. There is a newspaper article on this meeting. It is 5 days after Paul has died, and shortly after his funeral. The meeting is for John Lennon to meet Billy and approve him as the replacement 'Paul'. They all understood it had been a car accident, 5 days earlier, and this was the recommendation of British Intelligence to prevent unknown numbers of female fans committing suicide in grief. They have all signed documents which meant they could never disclose any of what this is. Billy goes there to that meeting with his girlfriend Maggie, who thinks he is the real Paul. She has written her recently released book from that perspective. This shows the meeting was with Billy.
Or, if it was the real Paul McCartney, then for some reason he brings along his secret girlfriend Maggie, He told her at the beginning that he wants to keep their affair secret..But she was okay about secretly starting an affair with another girl's boyfriend! Maggie has met up with the current 'Paul' in recent times, so this is the man she is talking about. She also says she spent many nights at his house in St.John's Wood, which is where he (as Billy) did move to on returning from Kenya the day before the first TV interview on December 20th 1966. On moving into that house in December, he immediately fired Paul's butler.
In reality, about 12 weeks before that meeting in Paris, the real Paul and Jane Asher had moved into Paul's new house in St. John's Wood, London.
That was around June 1966. He had also bought the farm in Scotland, recommended to him as a business investment. He and Jane made a flying visit to see it together on June 20th 1966.
If this was the 'real Paul' and he had wanted to keep this affair with Maggie secret, he would not have taken her to a meeting with Lennon and the manager Brian Epstein. The video also shows his long torso and shorter legs, and indications of his height of 6'.2". Maggie thinks this is the real 'Paul' and John has agreed to accept Billy as the replacement, but doubtful he went for walk with them, . Watch Video. (short)
* The second Paul has to have his hair in the layered cut version of the 'Beatles' 'mop'' becauseif he wore his hair as original Paul did, he would not be able to get away with that.
*This video shows that he did care about his family, and bought a house for his dad. It also shows inconsistencies with the later 'Paul'. It tells us that none of them had plans for solo recording careers. . Watch Video (When Paul's father died in 1976 he did not go to the funeral. His dad's wife told him not to 'dare come to the funeral'.)
The death of Paul McCartney in 1966 does at first seem to be one of those silly stories that sometimes happen.
People can get caught up in the 'car crash rumour' as a sort of jokey thing, but apparently it was not simply in a car crash - although the car crash aspect was the reason the remaining Beatles agreed to delay the announcement. They thought is was an accident.
In reality this looks like a murder by unknown numbers of people, with research indicating it was a satanic ritual. Satanism controls the 'entertainment industry' and the reasoning for most of what they do is bizarre, psychotic and bonkers.
It also involved additional separate crimes of cheating the Beatles out of their royalty rights - that was when 'Paul' secretly bought up more of the shares for their 'Apple Corps' company - and eventually, if the story is correct, impersonating Paul.
The Beatles knew there could be no more touring, and they would have to be a studio band. The understanding of the remaining three Beatles, was that Billy standing in as if 'Paul' for any videos or photo shoots was meant to be a temporary thing until the death in what they believed to be a car accident, could safely be announced without causing chaos and tragedy amongst grieving fans. As mentioned, the car accident and that he was killed, was announced on the news in the USA, and I believe it was in the UK too, then the story was pulled on orders from British Intelligence and the Crown.
A number of short videos have been included showing the real Paul McCartney to 1966.
Paul McCartney is LOVELY. Look at 'the person behind his eyes', his smile, his entire demeanor, everything.
I am going to add that in watching the early Beatles up to 1966 the real Paul McCartney is absolutely fantastic!
They all are wonderful together, just so special. You can not only see the energy and the happiness, you can feel it as an infectious joy. He is simply sensational.
The jerk we had in 'Wings' and still going today, is not the same person.
Maybe it was a hit on the head which changed his personality!
Or maybe the news report in 1966 was real and so is the research of Richard Balducci. The link to his videos, specifically 1882 is in the refernces on the McCartney page.
Introductory link John, Paul, George and Ringo'. The Fab 4 were Scouse likely lads from Merseyside. As I am English I know what that means, but that's what they were. They were fun, and in all their videos to the last one 'Rain' in 1966 you can feel their happy vibe. Then I checked the videos from 1967 for Strawberry Fields Forever, A Day in the Life, and Penny Lane, and there is no happy vibe. *I have never seen the videos before, I didn't know there were any. ** In watching the original videos to 1966 and their last ever song together 'Rain' I am getting to really love these guys. They are really great. Really special.
Why the 3 remaining real Beatles did not want to work with the 'fake Paul' 'Fake Paul' has said in interviews that he is not the original Paul McCartney. Read More.