....................
....
In today's world, everyone has been carefully guided into a mindset that locks them into the concept of Time.
It is assumed that life has progressed forward, and yet it is the opposite. Take away technology and you will see a very backward and undeveloped society in front of you. Keep the technology and you see the tools which have made that possible! Today's world has gone backwards. It is far less developed than before the 'programming' began. It is undeveloped, not very educated, and it is immature - precocious, but very immature. That is, not developed into participating in a more 'Positive world'. There is in fact, a reality model that works, is positive and is what was intended. The agenda has been to take reality into reverse, to go backwards. The purpose and reason is covered in the linked pages like 'Awake' and 'Asleep', and the topic of Code, Witchcraft, and Casting Spells.
We've covered the different stages of development of humans, for example out of a world population of over 7 billion, it is reported that around 5 billion did get the jab, without questioning it, and presumably fully understanding that it was experimental, had not been tested, and the official literal and ads clearly stated that it did not make anyone immune from the covid virus. So if I said to one of the near 5 billion that they had been 'mind controlled' etc, they would only refer to the source that is controlling them and do what they have been told to do - not question anything, and that such an idea as 'mind control' of the population was silly.
You will always get the question 'who are they?' - as if a 'they' could not possibly exist. Of course, these shadowy people can now be identified. But the attention span of people has been shortened, which is one of the alterations to the brain, so that has to be addressed too! The fixation with the cell phone has done that - and it happens while the brain is developing, so that is the way the brain has then been trained to funstion. Its a 'catch 22' (a paradox). The next thing I would have to draw their attention to is that this is part of the goals for introducing the Luciferian Religion - as mentioned this has been through popular TV shows and films about friendly witches, including the first satanic wizard and witchy thing in the Beatles' 1967 'Magical Mystery Tour', and through the Harry Potter movies etc.
They will only begin to 'get it' when they see the actual operation of this satanic agenda and realise what it is. Then it is possible for them to understand what has been taking place. But of course, as said, the human brain takes about 25 years to mature, from the obvious needs of a toddler and child under 10, to the less obvious but still continuing need for 'correct programming' through the teens. The 'programming' and 'mind control' gets to programme children's brains from the beginning, including with now well programmed, immature parents. This has been how it is for decades. It is designed to break up families, encourage divorce, and take everyone in a particular direction. Ultimately that direction is the desired outcome of the programming, which includes pedophilia.
This page is actually researching a possible murder, but is going back to when the programming for the current world really took off.
Some of these points include the gradual slandering of the remaining 3 real Beatles. When dealing with a sociopath, they can be very charming, and clever in the devious way that criminals and lesser level people believe is 'superiour intelligence'. The current 'Paul' is not charming or charismatic. He is riding the wave of a reputation established about 60 years ago.
In late 1966 The Beatles had just completed a successful tour of North America, despite controversy over John Lennon's comment that The Beatles were more popular than Jesus. It was a comment on the over the top adoration they were receiving, not that they were in some way 'better' than Jesus! But as always, the American public of the time missed the point. They returned to the UK to take a 12 week break. This was the time, the year after they had been 'advised' to take their song writing company public. They had agreed that everything would be shared equally, but by late 1966 and with Northern Songs having gone public, they discovered they had lost control of their songs and therefore royalties. There is no doubt that they had people around them more than willing to screw these young guys out of their earnings.
This same timing is also when Paul McCartney was in a car accident. It was seven days after his last ever public appearance at a Music Award show. It is not unusual that a car accident would happen, because it does happen, and people do die. In this case, it involved the most popular man on the planet. British Intelligence and the government made the decision that this should not be made public knowledge. It could not have happened without that level of cover. It was announced on the TV news once, in the UK and in the USA, then nothing more. Later investigations and an actual video for the song '1882' by the 'replacement Paul', indicate not only that the real Paul was killed, but that it was not the car crash, and involved a 'satanic ritual'. The video, by the current 'Paul' shows the autopsy photo. Surely a strange thing to place in a video? The injuries are consistent with having been hit with a particular type of axe used in rituals. Thus we look at the song 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer' below.
There are things that need to be looked into.
Knowing the true story explains why the real Beatles did not want to work with this 'fake Paul'.
The Beatles throughout their career to 1966 were entirely positive and a powerful influence for good.
Maybe this topic has to become a book, but more hopefully it will motivate others to do some research too. There is just so much that does not feel right, about this.
In beginning this research I had questions about why the middle section was left out of the recently released Beatles song 'Now and Then'. The fact that this essential part of this song was deliberately left out is part of making John Lennon and his work, just a little less while appearing to be something kind and friendly. It has also led to a recent #1 hit in the UK. But with the mid section, this song would have been infinitely more - as you can hear on the original, added at the end of the page.
'Fake Paul's' sick song about the psychopathic murder, using 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'
On the next linked pages we come to the murder of Paul McCartney in 1966. He was led into a car crash, the same as happened with Princess Diana. The autopsy photo and the research of Richard Balducci indicate a 'silver hammer' was used to strike Paul's head three times.
Fake Paul wanted this to be a released single, and it should be mentioned that the nutjob satanists love to decieve, flaunt their deceptions, and love to display their 'successes' in everyone's face. Had this been released as a single, then everyone would have been thoughtlessly participating in a jaunty singalong song about, or is a very similar topic, to the real Paul's death.
What's The Story Behind 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'? The psychopathic story of a murderer.
This is about the song with some in teresting and observant 'comedy' commentary. This is a very sick song. Watch Video.
MUSIC. SOUND PROJECT.
The current topic is The Beatles and Paul McCartney. This is a song I wanted to add because of the feature on the real Paul McCartney. This is Paul's song for Jane which he recorded when he was 23 on The Beatles last album together 'Revolver' which I decided to listen through. Jane was 20 They had been together since just before Jane's seventeenth birthday. In June 1966 Paul was Jane had moved into Paul's new house in St. John's Wood, London, still living together, and they were going to marry.
FEATURED TRACK
Watch Video 'Here, There and Everywhere' (Paul's song for Jane).
By the way, this is what loving someone should be.
"To lead a better life I need my love to be here Here, making each day of the year Changing my life with a wave of her hand Nobody can deny that there's something there There, running my hands through her hair Both of us thinking how good it can be Someone is speaking But she doesn't know he's there I want her everywhere And if she's beside me I know I need never care But to love her is to need her everywhere Knowing that love is to share Each one believing that love never dies Watching her eyes and hoping I'm always there I want her everywhere And if she's beside me I know I need never care But to love her is to need her everywhere Knowing that love is to share Each one believing that love never dies Watching her eyes and hoping I'm always there. I will be there And everywhere Here, there and everywhere."
.gif)
Paul's song for Jane is a very beautiful love song. Does it seem likely that he would be writing something as meaningful as this and at the same time meeting another woman named Maggie - who was a girlfriend (of Billy's) from 1966 to 1968 - and telling her he was going behind Jane's back and didn't want her to find this out, so keep the affair very quiet? Is this the type of person the real Paul McCartney was? I don't think so, and a lot of this situation is slandering and tarnishing the real Paul. Something is definitely wrong here.
In addition, those who gravitate to the Luciferian mindset, like the 'coneheads', do not have the ability for empathy, compassion and feeling, the kind of feeling humans have the ability for, and also astrologically, a very 'water sign' ability.
In a youtube video, the current 'fake Paul' claims this is his favourite Beatles song, as if was for John Lennon, and obviously it was for the real Paul. The song captures something that real humans will automatically understand, but those programmed into the current sex motivated lifestyle will not. In 'fake Paul's' decription of this song, he does not understand it! He compares it to a style from the 30's or '40's and completely misses what the real Paul is actually saying in this lovely song. Isn't that interesting!
On Sept. 16th 1966 there was a meeting in Paris
between Lennon, 'Paul' and Brian Epstein. There is a newspaper article on this meeting. It is 5 days after Paul has died, and shortly after his funeral. The meeting is for John Lennon to meet Billy and approve him as the replacement 'Paul'. They all understood it had been a car accident, 5 days earlier, and this was the recommendation of British Intelligence to prevent unknown numbers of female fans committing suicide in grief. They have all signed documents which meant they could never disclose any of what this is. Billy goes there to that meeting with his girlfriend Maggie, who thinks he is the real Paul. She has written her recently released book from that perspective. This shows the meeting was with Billy.
Or, if it was the real Paul McCartney, then for some reason he brings along his secret girlfriend Maggie, He told her at the beginning that he wants to keep their affair secret..But she was okay about secretly starting an affair with another girl's boyfriend! Maggie has met up with the current 'Paul' in recent times, so this is the man she is talking about. She also says she spent many nights at his house in St.John's Wood, which is where he (as Billy) did move to on returning from Kenya the day before the first TV interview on December 20th 1966. On moving into that house in December, he immediately fired Paul's butler.
In reality, about 12 weeks before that meeting in Paris, the real Paul and Jane Asher had moved into Paul's new house in St. John's Wood, London.
That was around mid June 1966. He had also bought the farm in Scotland, recommended to him as a business investment. He and Jane made a flying visit to see it together on June 20th 1966.
If this was the 'real Paul' and he had wanted to keep this affair with Maggie secret, he would not have taken her to a meeting with Lennon and the manager Brian Epstein. The video also shows his long torso and shorter legs, and indications of his height of 6'.2". Maggie thinks this is the real 'Paul' and John has agreed to accept Billy as the replacement, but doubtful he went for walk with them, . Watch Video. (short)
The interest in the 'Paul McCartney' issue is because it looks like a number of very real crimes were commited here.
We know for a fact that "Paul" did do something that cheated the other Beatles and it ended up with him getting more money than the rest of the Beatles. He became a billionaire, and that was long before he ever obtained the royalty rights back supposedly in 2017. The only way he could have done that is because he already had more royalties. And yet he probably would have made so much more had he continued as they had been, with him being very likeable. Why would he change so much, in looks, personality, viewpoints, and behaviour, from early September 1966 to mid-December 1966? He would become a shallow, money grabbing individual willing to cheat the other Beatles for his own gain, cheat on his girlfriend, and throw away his loving bond and friendship with them? *From what I can see, Paul was a down to earth 'good lad' who would always put family first and value love and friendship.
Why the 3 remaining Beatles did not want to do the Sgt. Pepper album.
The general story put out (by 'fake Paul') about the work from 1967 onwards and the 1967 Sgt.Pepper album is that John and George partcularly, were being too apathetic to get on with recording a new album and 'fake Paul' had to become the leader to make them work.
This image definitely casts Lennon and Harrison in a bad light. In reality, they were in mourning for the real Paul, and this 'fake version' had taken the situation of being the 'new Paul' and it had given him the right to 'rule and take charge of The Beatles. They could not say anything, they had signed official documents. They did not want to work with this person, they did not like him, they were grieving for the real Paul and here was someone who was now pretending to be the person they loved. This is another reason why the truth needs to be made known. Saying these things is slandering the real Beatles.
They were not being petty about 'business matters' although those issues were serious. They were stuck in a terrible and emotionally devastating situation - and could not dislose why.
The Sgt. Pepper album is great because it is produced and mixed as a Beatles album and because of the contribution by John.
It is the John Lennon tracks which stand out, like 'Lucy in the Sky', ''Mr Kite', and 'Day in the Life'. Also George Harrison's 'Within You and Without You'. In Lennon's later solo song 'How do You Sleep' his introducing words are "So Sgt. Pepper took you by surprise". Most of the really great tracks on Sgt. Pepper were John's even though the 3 real Beatles expressed no liking for the album, and it was a 'fake Paul's' project.
Much of this looks as if the fake Paul is making The Beatles' legacy all about him.
The videos of the 4 members of The Beatles
for both the stage performances and their song releases always have that special energy. They are alive and dynamic, and fun, obviously enjoying themselves.
I would like to show a short video that someone has compiled which features Paul, and if you just focus on the fun of the music and stage performance of basically a club or pub band who play entertaining rock and roll - not the timeframe of the '60's - then you will see how appealing, charismatic, and nice the real Paul McCartney was. Watch Video. I came across this recently and the performance shown always makes me smile. It is 'feel good' and positive. This is the original and real Paul. The fake Paul, never exhibits any of this charisma.
I also checked the videos of song tracks for after 1966, and while the studio recordings do sound like The Beatles, and are okay, the videos are definitely off. I didn't know there were any videos of some of the tracks from 1967 but there are. Everything they did from 1967 was "'Paul's' idea" starting with Sgt. Pepper which is all about death and drugs, and then the TV film Magical Mystery Tour which was not much of a success even though the music was.
The film again lacks the energy and charisma of their earlier films, it is lacklustre, and this would appear to be because 'fake Paul' has none of the charisma, and also because the remaining three real Beatles don't like him, and are also still grieving for the real Paul who now has this jerk portraying him, and they have to go along with that. The reason is because they agreed to it.
They are not happy, there is no 'feel good' energy, not the same 'vibe'. There just isn't! Also when I looked at this track 'Hello, Goodbye' it is almost like an early AI recontruction of Paul with his face superimposed over the person (Billy) who was actually there for this. To me, it does look odd, particularly when you look for this. His neck and head in some angles seem added onto the body. Also George's face seems to say it all! (He's in the salmon colour). It is like the finished version of the 'Paul' character was added afterwards. It probably requires one viewing watching George's face, and another looking at 'Paul'. Watch Video.
NEW. * In addition, I found a video where 'Paul' is in normal conversation but it is not the Liverpudlian accent that is usually heard. I have to find that to check it again.
*Another video is a Howard Stern Show interview where he is really rubbishing the remaining 3 real Beatles. Obviously Howard Stern was given this story by 'Paul' What was 'Paul' thinking releasing his solo album at the same time as The Beatles. Watch Video. 1+minute
* The second Paul has to have his hair in the layered cut version of the 'Beatles' 'mop'' becauseif he wore his hair as original Paul did, he would not be able to get away with that.
*This video shows that he did care about his family, and bought a house for his dad. It also shows inconsistencies with the later 'Paul'. It tells us that none of them had plans for solo recording careers. . Watch Video (When Paul's father died in 1976 he did not go to the funeral. His dad's wife told him not to 'dare come to the funeral'.)
I have found photos of Paul and Jane which have been photo-shopped with 'fake Paul'. An example is on the John, Paul, George and Ringo page. Some faked pictures added below. The video clip of the full version of 'Now and Then' done earlier disappeared from the internet the same day as the release - but luckily someone else put a copy of it back up.
The short, newly added stage performance video featuring the real Paul's solos on stage shows an amazing person with charisma and charm.
I just love him! But I don't like the 'Paul' the world has had since 1967 and he appears to be a narcissistic jerk. In reading some comments for some videos, others have used these descriptions too.
If this was a murder - and that is what 3 strikes with an axe to the head is - then everyone should know about this.
It is extremely disturbing to consider that this young, happy 24 year old appears to have been a deliberate target, and his life was ended.
The death of Paul McCartney in 1966 does at first seem to be one of those silly stories that sometimes happen.
People can get caught up in the 'car crash rumour' as a sort of jokey thing, but apparently it was not simply in a car crash - although the car crash aspect was the reason the remaining Beatles agreed to delay the announcement. They thought is was an accident.
In reality this looks like a murder by unknown numbers of people, with research indicating it was a satanic ritual. Satanism controls the 'entertainment industry' and the reasoning for most of what they do is bizarre, psychotic and bonkers.
It also involved additional separate crimes of cheating the Beatles out of their royalty rights, and eventually impersonating Paul, the understanding of the remaining three Beatles, being that this was just meant to be a temporary thing until the death in what they believed to be a car accident, could safely be announced without causing chaos and tragedy amongst grieving fans. As mentioned, this was announced on the news in the USA, and I believe it was in the UK too, then the story was pulled on orders from British Intelligence and the Crown.
The story includes the fact that this replacement person's ex-wife Heather FOUND the information on this. There are also a few more untimely deaths connected to this too, including the roadie Mal Evans. The real Paul McCartney can be witnessed in all their material to the end of The Beatles in August 1966 after their last North American tour.
A number of short videos have been included showing the real Paul McCartney to 1966.
Paul McCartney is LOVELY. Look at 'the person behind his eyes', his smile, his entire demeanor, everything.
The real Paul is nothing like 'fake Paul' who is also older, around 28 years old to Paul's 23. Fake Paul was a bit of a whore, and a number of females have written books on what they thought was an affair they had with Paul McCartney. One of these does keep refering to Billy though. The real Paul was in a serious relationship with actress Jane Asher who he met when she had just reached 17, in 1963. They were still together in 1966, and I have now added a song here that is a very clear indication that this was a truly 'in love' relationship that an ordinary 'lad from Liverpool' would have valued. It is so sweet and tender that it brings tears to my eyes that this young, but real love was taken from them like this. - because it was. Jane was also under the Official Secrets Act of non-disclosure.
*There is also a timeline on the sequence of events. It includes details that most people don't know such as that John Lennon at that time was in Germany filming before the rest of the filming in Spain. Most people only know about the 5 weeks in Spain. John Lennon also always says he was filming in Spain and doesn't mention Germany. But the first part was actually in Germany. The timeline of the tragedy that occured, is on the 'McCartney' page.
Keep in mind that the person now presenting as Paul McCartney wore a mask and TV make up when on camera, and for videos all sorts of professional tricks were used to make it 'Paul'. Now this person is an old man, so the mask is not needed. Its just the aging. The current 'Paul' from 1967 and when young, wore a mask/TV make-up mask. Go to 4.58 on this video of this interview. It is actually a good interview. BUT our famous person being interviewed here is surely wearing a mask.. Watch it before someone tries to make it 'Private'. Watch Video Go to 4.58. *When arrested in Japan for having the 'Mary Jane' that he is speaking about was not the problem. The problem was that his fingerprints did not match those on file from the real Paul's tour there
I am going to add that in watching the early Beatles up to 1966 the real Paul McCartney is absolutely fantastic!
They all are wonderful together, just so special. You can not only see the energy and the happiness, you can feel it as an infectious joy. He is simply sensational.
The jerk we had in 'Wings' and still going today, is not the same person.
Introductory link John, Paul, George and Ringo'.
The Fab 4 were Scouse likely lads from Merseyside. As I am English I know what that means, but that's what they were. They were fun, and in all their videos to the last one 'Rain' in 1966 you can feel their happy vibe. Then I checked the videos from 1967 for Strawberry Fields Forever, A Day in the Life, and Penny Lane, and there is no happy vibe. *I have never seen the videos before, I didn't know there were any. ** In watching the original videos to 1966 and their last ever song together 'Rain' I am getting to really love these guys. They are really great. Really special.
More on 'Fake Paul's' sick song about the psychopathic murder, using 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'
By the time The Beatles were recording the track "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" the remaining 3 Beatles were aware of what had really happened to Paul.. John had drawn a drawing of the head wound. It is no wonder that Lennon wanted no part of recording this sick song.
But yet again, because the real story is not known John's grief at the real issue of Paul's death is used to represent him as a mean and petulent person. The reality is, this is a terrible song tht appears to be about how the real Paul McCartney was murdered.
Again the representation is slandering John Lennon.
How The Beatles Recorded "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" | The Abbey Road Sessions Watch Video
Watch Video
By the way, listen to how this 'fake Paul' speaks in this irritating way.
What's The Story Behind 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer'? The psychopathic story of a murderer.
This is about the song with some in teresting and observant 'comedy' commentary. This is a very sick song. Watch Video.
Original version uploaded 3 weeks ago, with the middle section 'Now and Then' . Uploaded by 'Iamaphony' who provides evidence of the 'fake Paul'. In this the 'Paul' character is showing the Masonic 'Hidden Hand' symbol which identifies this person as a Freemason and therefore not the real Paul. .
Internet comment "Iamphoney has the original sound . Iamphoney made the Real Version of this beautiful song. Please share this version everywhere because it is how the real 3 Beatles made it."
For the research and references please go to this page : McCartney Murder page