Began in July 2026.
***This commentary was inspired by a youtube channel feature on the Hadid sisters, and they simply did not look as 'amazing' as was being described!
It's not about 'body shaming'. That is an awful thing to do to anyone. It is that by trying to pretend various looks are the 'beauty standard' is in fact drawing attention to 'body shaming'. It is about parading women in circus shows, and reaching millions of viewers, as 'rocking it' when they are not.
If our world does not respect and acknowledge those who have achieved something special and they get lumped in with those who are not, then there is a problem and it is a problem that is going to upset a lot of people on all sides. .
OR explain to us why all the new robot 'replacement girlfriends' - which men are definitely going to go for based on the current standards of females - then why are they very attractive, pretty, slim, and keep to the standard considered 'good looking'?
No doubt they will add some different ones to cater to different tastes, but to launch 'robot girlfrends' and make this option take off, the robots are all good looking by the standard that is considered good looking.
In fact the robot girlfriend "who can do what a real girlfriend does but better" undoubtedly will include pre-pubescent robots, Lolitas suited to the Epstein taste, teenage male robots, or freakier things, because there is a huge market.
By the way, the photos above show the dedication of training, in this case for classical ballet. This was my fulltime professional career, and like most others, I trained for 12 years, so it would not be a good thing to see, if suddeny someone decided to replace those who had done all this training, with someone who had not done the required training - and then pretend it was the same standard!
There have been a number of unrealistic or 'not up to scratch' issues with 'beauty pageant' winners, pop stars, and "models" which all seem to be fixed events, or careers acquired through insider contacts of the wealthy, along with unrealistic praise which in turns earns them more money, and creates the apparent need for everyday people to undergo cosmetic procedures and 'enhancements'.
The article began with that topic, but also looks at wholistic care, and aiming for better examples - because some people are going to extreme lengths with surgery to deform themselves into grotesque, unnatural shapes, and looks, with their chins, with adding cement into their heads, or simply fooling themselves that what has been featured is something everyone supposedly thinks looks good when it doesn't and people do not think that.
With the unrealistic expectations - and some of the things now, are unrealistically glorifying looks that are not all that good - ordinary girls think they are more 'spectacular' than they realistically are, and are charging men for dates with them, or angry the man is not spending $100 on a date with them, or in other ways. Many also get upset when people do not respond to them as being as 'outstanding' as they think they are, then blame it on 'racism' or similar devisive issues. This we are also saying that by 'levelling out the field' a great deal of damage is done.
In addition, those who are not the right people for any number of jobs in the workplace, are added into positions they are not suited for as DEI hires and people who are far better suited and qualified are overlooked.
On the spiritual side, it is important that the 'Higher World' dominates.
If the 'lower world' was to dominate, then civilization would come to a dead end. As far as models go, which is why we had this comment, those who run the world behind the scenes have deliberately made everything run of the mill and ordinary. Everyone has to compete with more cosmetic 'work' done because of some faked standard through filters, and then we have ordinary looking people as the 'role models'.
There is no point in having 'models' who are supposed to represent glamour, if they are ordinary and the same as ordinary girls. For example, perhaps it is good that people are able to create businesses because of the online platforms we now have, but in the category we are discussing, they should not be seen as remotely comparable to what existed up until around 15 years ago.
There are endless 'nice looking' girls but that doesn't mean they are anything special. It was the 'specialness' that made them interesting. And we do really appreciate those girls who reached or represented those standards.
As for this work, people, mainly females, do want to know about rejuvenation and healthy skincare and lifestyle routines,
plant based diets and exercise, and we are going to include some of these things. We are also pointing out things that are not so good.
Many people, mostly females, are interested in remaining youthful and at their best via the Plant Food diet, and healthy living,
as well as following the guidelines of the 'Living Light and Life Streams'.
At the end we've added a few Spas that we get to enjoy by living here in Cambodia. There are fantastic forms of traditional massage for activating meridians, creating nerve pathways, muscle release, and traditional facial treatments, not all the RF, Hifu, Thermage, Ultherapy, and so on, or botox of filler route at all, but natural and wholistic, and which really are a wonderful, healthy, and effective to do.
We think that the 'powers that be' are lowering the expectations we can aim for, but making it almost mandatory that we all must pay out to be a 'presentable standard' that is not how humans naturally are!
Also, that there are not any really 'role models'. That is the point of having 'models', it's not about seeing oversized or quirky looking people. We all know we are not going to look like a 20 year 'supermodel', but we do know that a'supermodel' does look like a 'supermodel'.
We do recommend body brushing, and body scrubs to remove dead skin, and liven up the circulation and as a very positive and healthy thing to do for your body health.
We do recommend using high quality cold pressed high nutrient content oils for the body and the face. And of course we recommend exercise. We will add more on these things, but please enjoy the links to some of our favourite Spas here in Cambodia - for inspiration!
But we are not so pleased about having non-exceptional people represented as something 'special' or placed in the 'supermodel' class.
There are probably no exceptional models around in today's world, and 'beauty standards' or more correctly 'how one looks' are based on ordinary people who are presenting their own youtube channels. meaning there is nothing exceptional anymore, and all of it is about fake looks through make-up literally creating a 'face', or it is through cosmetic procedures 'creating a face'.
Those who are current models and overpaid have the jobs they have, because their parents were previously modles, or are wealthy.
Then they inspire others to have cosmetic surgery when really the 3 examples given here are not exceptional!
This girl on the left is Kate Moss's daughter Lila who because of who her mother is, has a modelling career. Highly paid models such as Bella Hadid and also Gigi Hadid are consistently described as 'beautiful' when in general opinion of others this is not the case. It is a shame they are models, but it was an easy job to get into because they had a wealthy father, and also their mother was known because she had been a model, and she appeared in one of the 'Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' (or one of those places) in 2012.
My make up brushes were from Gigi Hadid, but I had not paid any attention to her as a 'name'. Both sisters had a remarkably easy journey to $million incomes. I did watch the new look 'Victoria's Secret' show in 2024 (which was a debacle) - and it featured a very wishy washy looking Gigi in pink satin and angel wings, and that was mainly the first time I'd seen her. Gigi does not have the 'Victoria's Secret' body.
Somehow none of the Victoria's Secret girls had any of the glamour image of the original shows.
Both sisters are okay, yet not unusually good looking BUT they are in the business because their mother was a model and their father is a very rich man. Perhaps in some photos they are fortunate to photograph well, but it seems more likely they became 'names' because of the parents.
Most 'models', like these Hadid sisters, are the daughters of former models, also like Kate Moss's daughter (in first picture on the left) , and she should not be a model.
There are two other 'celebrities' who do not warrant the hype. They are Halley Beiber who is nothing to look at, but is from the Baldwin family, and has just made a $1 billion by selling a skincare range she created only 3 years ago, and also Sydney Sweeney who does not warrant being called an actress, and that 'film actress' means making a lot of money when the talent is not there, but the boobs are.
We also have to say now that Victoria's Secret girls may have been involved in 'special parties' as mentioned in the 'recruitment party' at Mar-a-Lago party video at the end.
Hadids.
Chosen, and paid, to star in the 2024 Victoria's Secret show.
2024 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show: Tyra Banks, Gigi Hadid & More.
Watch First 2 mins.. First comment you can see that neither Gigi nor Bella look as good, or the right category, as the original pre 4 year hiatus VS models. This is because the show organizers are NOT featuring the same standard they used to have. Bella looks like a showgirl would look. Kate Moss looks miserable, and her daughter was not what you would call VS standard. The original VS models really put the work in to be as good as they were.
Secondly the comments by Ashley Graham who has a lovely face, no question, but is an elephant on the catwalk that no level of lingerie changes the reality of. Ashley in the interview says that she is a mum of 3 children in her late 30's and "rocking it on the catwalk" - which she did not.
There is no inspiration in seeing a show as this was. We don't what happened with the 2025 show, but Tyra Banks did not appear, and she should not have appeared in the 2024 show. It was disappointing to see.
For a reality check here, Adriana Lima DID appear and she is a 42 year old (or something) mum of 3 children and she looked great. They didn't give her the best of outfits to wear, and hair was very severe, but she remained what we would expect - and want to see - of a Victoria's Secret show.
I have also seem the gym work that Adriana put in for the show (she hs maintained herself anyway) but the there are videos of her in the gym, and this is great inspiration. It makes you want to go to the gym and get fit and healthy.
The reality is that a very overweight Ashley Graham did not represent what a late 30's mum of 3 wants to look like. That doesn't mean she should, or anyone should be bpdy shamed, but this is not the look to present as pretending to be 'attractive'.
This fake appreciation of 'ordinary looks' is contributing to the unrealistic view very ordinary girls have of themselves today
which is a very big problem, (especially for men ) and is covered in the last video here which is about the new very human looking female robots as an alternative to what is available for men.
Also the original standards for the VS shows.
Featuring Tyra Banks in the 2024 Victoria's Secret return show, was a display of every woman's nightmare.
We see Tyra in 2005 as the person most young women see themselves as, but women know that somewhere in the future, they end u reaching 50 and looking like Tyra Banks. It is a nightmare, that women have to face might be ahead for them within a timeframe of 15 to 20 years later than being 25.
It is a lie to pretend that women do not dread what can happen, and 'embracing' it, does not answer the unwanted circumstance that it is. What we want is to know there are things women can do about this, to prevent this happening. It is a lie to pretend otherwise.
We want to see the examples of those who have found ways to prevent these things happening. In everyday life, Tyra, who was once a slim, attractive VS model, is a valid person who has changed considerably from what she was.
She has to embrace that or do more to try to overcome it, and she should not be judged or commented on in normal life circumstances. We don't have to 'embrace' the older version of herself. And if she chooses to get up on stage to display this to a vast audience of viewers in a show that was once about female beauty standards, then she also presents herself for the negative comments.
We have now added the research to look at as much as we could tolerate looking at the 2025 show which was in October 2025.
Of the online comments, the most telling was that they brought back quite a number of the 'old models' from the heyday, and that saved the show.
The rest were mostly a dreary selection of 'models' (who could be on Instagram) and body types that most people don't overly want to see. The lingerie might be attractive - we don't know - because none of it looked attractive on the models.
So let me add here, that I did used to buy Victoria's Secret lingerie,
mainly camisoles and 'interesting pieces' and they also have/had lounge wear. I was a customer from the 1990's. This was because it was all very pretty with lots of lace, and it was nice to get these. With the comeback shows (there have been 2 of them) I do not feel inclined to buy Victoria's Secret merchanize. To me, in my opinion, the show is ruined by the lack of quality in the models they are using, in fact they look like they are auditioning for 'Only Fans'. I will even say grotesque in some cases. The original format was healthy, attractive, sexy girls obviously, but with a nice wholesome quality. This is not the case now.
10 years ago and before it would mean something to say you were a 'Victoria's Secret' model, but after 2024 it means absolutely nothing. The entire mix looks uncomfortable just by making it such a mix. We do have a 2 minute look at the 2024 show above.
As such, I am reviewing the 'Victoria's Secret' superb models in the heyday of their shows - because there is no comparison with what they have been presenting with their come-back. Like Ashley Graham, who has a really lovely face, but is an unattractive elephant on the runway that no lingerie can make look good. But she is lovely looking, and I admire her for that. But not as a model to show lingerie.
So I am putting a video here of a 'Top 10' selection, and I am also looking at Miranda Kerr's own videos for her organic lifestyle and skincare range that she has. She is now 43 and has 4 children. She looks really great, but I am already a fan. I think she was the prettiest VS model but it is very close because they were all gorgeous and great inspiration. But I personally don't think the ones they are using today or in 2024/5, are so good. It is like watching a 'Miss World' contest where the girls are really very pretty, but are "representing real life". Why bother?
But I am looking at the really high standard of looks these girls worked for, but with a comparison especially in these days of 'Instagram' and filters. Obviously to have this kind of look a girl has to be about 5' 9" tall because that gives all the extra length to the legs. These are all "older generation" girls and they are absolutely stunning. My favourites are Doutzen Kroes (very pretty) from the Nederlands, Miranda Kerr from Australia (she is also so pretty) and I do also like Adriana Lima from Brazil. Behati prinsloo from Namibia was very pretty too plus had all the right looks they all had, with height, proportions and personality on the catwalk.
Top 10 Victoria's Secret Angels of All Time
Watch 14 mins. This is just for fun of course.
Mostly I like and admire the sheer work, dedication and effort they put in, as well as the efforts they put in to remain level headed and support their marriages and family. I tend not to overly like Karoline Kurkova, nor Candice Swanepeol who is a blonde South African like the very pretty Charlize Theron, both from Sth Africa, (but Theron totally conformed to what was required with the 'deal with the devil' and no matter how she looks, she is a disappointing, bad example), I don't much care for Tyra Banks - but especially after seeing her in the 2024 VS show looking terrible, and she should have done herself a favour and not done that show (she wisely didn't turn up for the 2025 show apparently.) There is no way looking like that can be contrived to be 'embracing the self' and 'attractive'. Not keen on Giselle Bundchen, but she is still stunning with a stunning figure, and as said, they are all very stunning.
I am also looking at Miranda Kerr's own videos for her organic lifestyle and skincare range that she has. She is a very good example of how to be natural, level headed, and all of what she does is very positive to see. She was a former Victoria's Secret 'supermodel' from Australia, and is now 43 and has 4 children. She looks really great, but I am already a fan. I think she was the prettiest VS model but it is very close because they were all gorgeous and great inspiration. But I don't think the recent 're-invented VS Show' is worth looking at, and the ones they are using today or in 2024, are not so good.
Watch 6 mins. This is Miranda Kerr, 3 months ago, former VS model who now has 4 children and her oldest is her 15 year old son Flynn. Really hard to believe! Of course I can't get her products here, and they are very expensive too, but most of her 'well being philosophy' is like my own.
For interest here are some of my favourite spas in Siem Reap (that I go to) and they produce very high quality herbal and organic oils and skincare.
Bodia Spa in Siem Reap. Excellent place and excellent service. Continue.
Chitta Spa.
ORDINARY LOOKS.
This is within the category of where the world is now, at the peak of its 'reverse of True'. The world that will not survive, because of its overwhelming number of 'faults' and mistakes, as opposed to the reality in the "True Reality". It is actually quite difficult to be okay with how the consciousness is in 'this world'.
This now refers to every almost 'influencer' in this category, and as some videos have commented how they all look the same, act the same, pose in the same way, wiggle about like the 'sex sirens' they all now believe themselves to be.
As pointed out by other commentators, these run of the mill ordinary girls with their 'glossed up looks' are all over the place, with huge egos and those people who really are genuinely exceptional are not the focus we all once used to have. As commented (and we will try to find the video references) the girls are all showing as much of their bodies as they can get away with and there is no style or appropriateness in how they dress, just so long as they look like they are looking as sexual as possible. We will try to find the video commentary and also show the real problem there is now.
Not only do they all look the same, they all have the same personality. That personality is 'I'm fantastic'. And the look is the title below this!
The look is universally that of the 'girlfriend' type of a rich pimp, like Andrew or Tristan Tate.
The other issue is how many sheep there are who follow a nobody who is now a successful 'influencer'. They simply follow and copy. Possibly the recent pop-up event for Hailey Bieber's Rhode brand shows how incredibly sheeplike people are. This is just a simple brand cosmetic line which gives Hailey Bieber's apparently 'signature' glossy look. It can be said that there are a zillion options out there to produce that 'glowy look'. To be honest, we think most of the same options have been around for decades!
At this event, which was nothing more than selling the amount of product that they had in stock for the event, there was a queue which kept people in line for many hours, just to get to the product. It was not unlike the fanaticism that went with buying a new Apple phone.
What we are seeing is the latching onto one person and then worshiping that person and her products. After all, who would not start marketing a product if there were a hord of sheep out there who wanted to become the clone of the said person? It is similar to the mental problem happening in China where girls are paying for surgery to have the SAME face.
The point is firstly, they do all look the same, so there is no originality, or individual style for that matter. The products may or may not produce the 'signature' glossy look, but anyone can achieve this easily with a great many other products. The issue is this crazy 'hive mind' identity that it must be this product and that you would queue up for many hours just to buy it. Presumably the scarcity aspect is part of the sales technique. BTW Hailey's cosmetic brand was sold to elf who are now the owners.
The second point is the huge arrogance that goes with this,
which creates people that are not really worth knowing. Before, those in this 'arrogant categeory' may have been lesser in number, but now they are everywhere.
*We will look to find the video which shows what this really is. (Fraud and Corruption).
Who could we list as a girl of exceptional looks? Can't think of anyone in the current time frame but can give examples of the best of the VS models before they decided to include all shapes and sizes. Then say all girls/women who really worked to look good, have style, but not look like an audition to be Andrew Tate's girlfriend.
Generally we would say that it is not just the looks, but also the demeanor and attitude of the women and girls who really stood out, at least how they were in public because not all of them were as good as they looked! However, having some kind of style and presence did matter.
Let's go back to include Catherine Deneuve, to Monica Bellucci, Olivia Hussey, maybe Salma Hayak and Liz Hurley, Charlize Theron, Priyanka Chopra-Jonas, Brigitte Bardot. Britt Eklund. *We will probably think of many more and hopefully add them.
Today's world and the 'young members' of today's world, are ruining their faces with surgical procedures to change how they look, or make how they look 'better' when this is not actually what is happening. Many think they should look like what the filters show them to be.
But the reality is they are not that.
The girls in China seem to be the worst, literally changing their faces to look like someone else, with multiple surgeries even from their teens.
There is a price that comes with doing this to your face. The surgery inhibits the blood flow for a start. The skin will never function the same after doing these things, and also the areas worked on will stretch, and that means out of shape.
We featured a pretty girl of 26 on a breakfast TV programme, who had gone to Turkey for a facelift. She felt she needed to do that, to get in early with it. Those alterations will lead to a less effective blood flow, and it will stretch. In addition, the facelift was not good. She had ruined her face. No matter how kindly one wants to say that, she had ruined her face.
So has the new 'Frankenstein's monster' Katie Price. She is on youtube channels showing her latest surgery and she looks grotesque. It seems these females are not sensitively aware enough to really consider what they are showing to the world. This photo is earlier in her journey to ruining her face. She probably fools herself into thinking this pouty look, looks good.
Katie was an ordinary looking girl, that's the truth, but she was a glamour model showing her body + the required make up and 'look'. Nevertheless, as ordinary as the next girl. Like the level of the girls who consider they are/were Andrew Tate's girlfriend. Someone should tell them they are ordinary. Nice looking ordinary - until they use falter, and go for the red light whore look which pretty much transforms everyone into a 'sex goddess'. But that is all it is.
So, Katie obviously felt the need to this with her lips. There are problems with these crazy lips, which can include necrosis. Also a lip-lift surgery with problems that most are surpised to discover has happened to them.
There is a lip lift surgery - probably done by doctors who are not qualified cosmetic surgeons, because most are not - and it is creating a 'rabbit mouth'. The lips may not close, but worse is when they smile and it shows all the gums in a truly unattractive smile.
The ladies with their youtube channels mentioned below, all look how they really look. It's not about filters (as far as we know, and that is a different topic being covered.)
The video at the end on filters, also points out that people do like the 'fake look'.
Another thing influencers are doing with their podcasts is showing all the ugly side of what they do to 'prepare their look'.
It is suggested that it really isn't necessary to do that, nor is it the best thing to do for how you feel. Getting ready to be seen by the world, is private.
Why do they need to show their faces at their worst?
A 67 year old with no make-up and her hair in big curlers, to then show she transforms into an attractive woman with her make-up and her hair loose. We would say, 'don't show that'. There seems to be some kind of need to do this 'showing yourself at your worst', then the creators worry that they do get negative comments.
***Actually the lady at 67 is very attractive and has wonderful long hair that some other "older women" simply have to say a negative comment about . This unfortunately is very much a reality with the "older women" who seem not to be able to stop themselves doing this. They suggest she gets her hair cut, but this lady's long hair is gorgeous.
However, the ladies and girls who set up these channels sharing their own skincare and make up ideas, or image and so on, but often they are just ordinary, everyday people sharing their opinions, they do or can opne themselves up to comments from those who view their content.
Another one (amongst so many that we couldn't begin to cover them) but its a woman of 48 who looks like an attractive Barbie Doll type. Like a Mar-a-Lago Hollywood bombshell creation like the Anna Nicholl Smith look, or the Jayne Mansfield look (a starlet from the 1950's). It's the Gen X Dolly Parton type. It's based on a Nordic blonde hair colour, long and blow dried style, and big boobs - she discusses how she has done this operation 4 times.
But she swears like a trouper throughout, and it is extremely unattractive. It makes her unattractive. It makes anyone unattractive. It is so foul that we cannot stomach watching her videos. So it is suggested not to do it (all the foul language.) . She does all that she does to look 'hot' because she clearly relies on that for her self ID, her business, and it raises her confidence, and then she opens her filthy mouth....!
This woman at 48 is too young to be discussing how she 'solved the problems' of a slightly older age group than she is. She has not encountered the problems yet!
However, the has successfully started several businesses and definitely upscaled how she looks from being a 'guttersnipe' or self described 'hillbilly' living in poverty and very low behaviour standards while growing up in the Appalacian Mountains, and transformed how she looks to that of a person accepted in let's say LA society, or Mar-a-Lago society. So, that is her image she has worked for, but she does not understand that her speech is foul! This continual swearing is not "who she is". It is "who she was" and it ain't good! Despite this, what she has done is create herself as a 'role model'.
She has basically created herself as another 'idol' to worship. That's how it goes, and that's all it is. These 'examples' become 'idols' that some people worship.
However, she thinks that all her filthy swearing is 'who she is'. Its how she grew up in poverty and although she changed her look to be the 'expensive, trashy American gaudy looks, she didn't upgrade her self presentation. She still thinks all the swearing is "who she is". I simply cannot watch her videos. She began her channel in 2009 and for all that she represents, she only has 66k subscribers. This is probably because of her filthy language throughout, while presenting that she is 'put together' stylish woman. This is how bad that is.
It used to be the standard that always, how you were seen in public, was 'you' at your best.
Then there is the facelift that someone live streamed after it, (we didn't see this, we just know about it) but she did show her face after surgery in videos we saw, and then how it is at the current time. Why show this? They all do. But why? The facelift result is okay. It's okay but she still looks mostly the same.
This work does not especially recommend jumping in there with facelifts. Maybe it is better to wait to being in your 60's. Until then, microneedling is recommended, although we cannot get this where we are based.
We are told that Microneedling, skin needling, will work well because if you have it professionally and the needle is the necessary length of 1.5 mm to 1,75 mm (but less on thin skin areas, obviously) then this is the safest way to repair damage and build collagen.
We are saying that today's attitude is too casual about this kind surgery.
The girls who are in their 20's doing multiple procedures are probably going to experience some unpleasant realities when they get into their 30's and the scars have stretched.
There are hundreds of features of botched surgeries on Hollywood actors, and popstars. Also taking Ozempic is ruining Hollywood stars like Charlize Theron as the most recent one we have seen. her face still seemed to be okay, but her was not. Generally we hear that people cannot get that fat padding back.
Sorry but with the kind of girls available today, these robots are going to win.
This $1,370 Female Humanoid Robot Will Replace Your WIFE | BEST ONE Ever
Watch 8 mins. Firstly the newest robots are good for lonely, elderly people. China seems to have developed the most realistic human behaving ones, including how they walk. And many 'stars' do have their own lookalike robots who have been shown to suddenly go quiet, fall over, or similar and have been described as 'clones' but they were robots. There was a website we found in 2020 for 'synthetic humans' and then the company changed the links to keep it quiet. "Synthetic human embryos can be created from stem cells without the need for eggs or sperm, allowing researchers to study early human development and potentially address fertility issues.' They hypothetically can create a cloned type of robot.
As for replacing females, with the unrealistic nonsense from some (many) women these days about dating, how much a man must spend on them, or booking the date through her own created (app !) - the one we saw charged $75 to the book date - and their own perception of their 'worth', along with how they look and how they behave (not unlike Bonnie Blue) it is very credible that men who can afford this will switch to these robots. This won't be good enough for men who are the 'Higher Self' but they do provide an asnwer for the lonely men who just can't find a decent girl. The option is also good for shallow, superficial men who only care about appearance.
And on another level makes a great choice for the princes, filmstars and billionaires who are targetted by well practised professional 'hidden whores' who are very good at acting to be nice, natural, unspoit and whatever. So many of these richest and most powerful men do get fooled, and do marry these 'bottom of the barrel' whores - or 'opportunistic women'! So a robot is good, but also good for the men who are trashed and overlooked by the awful standard of female that exists today. As for those men in the 'Internet Comments' who ask if the robots will do the cleaning and cooking, well, not many worthwhile women want to be looked at as being that kind of role. You'll need to be able to afford and housekeeper and a cook, or order in of course! *We have checked through various videos on 'today's females' and it is very bad.
"Epstein's People Lured Me to a Mar-A-Lago Prostitute Party" 
Watch This woman reports on going to a 'recruitment party' but it does sound that she was possibly interested in what it was. There is a lot about the girls being drugged. This video does indicate how 'models' get to marry a 'contract rich husband'.
Internet Comments : "Great to let her speak, we need to understand the moral depravity of these elites. They’re disgusting and belong in jail."
"These contracts. Did Melania have a contract?"
(Not : There is some likelihood that Melania was an asset provided by Putin, even back in the mid '90's. If she has got away from that toxic Trump environment, good on her!)
NOBODY LOOKS LIKE THEIR INSTAGRAM ANYMORE...
Watch. 20 mins. This is to show how unreal and unrealistic people are about how they do actualy look - because it isn't the Instagram version that is real. Never-the-less the faked image people see of themselves often leads to tremendous arrogance and egotism, and rudeness because this sets up some kind of interpretation about themselves. Overall, this is a comment on the problems of being in the peak of the 'reverse world'.
Clearly it would seem, that talking really fast is part of how this type of youtube has to done. However, it's just for the comparison pictures really.
The Khloe Kardasshian bikini photo is first of all, who the hell is Khloe Kardasshian and why do we know about her? Second, it's a not good photo, its an ordinary, older woman in a bikini, and it is okay.