Earth RESET NEWS

. Best viewed on anything but Google

Macrons v Owens Update.

Owens is continuing and the issue now is that Brigitte ever existed. That is, she wasn't born at all. Apparently the family photo was somehow altered because there is a lampshaade in one version and not in another version. And the possibility of them making an error like that for the photo they sent seems as stupid as it can get. That was pointed out in the series but brought up again in Owen's continuing with this thing. So, again, was she set up here? On the other hand if they did it deliberately it gibes her an excuse to keep on.

This episode which is current introduces a man named Alain Trogneux who is working at the same school where Brigitte was a drama teacher at La Provedance. He was there from 1991 to 2007 or thereabouts and that is the same dates roughly that Brigitte was there. She was not using her maiden name though, she was Brigitte Auziers. So who is or was Alain? The chocolate making family is big and has much older children so easily Alain could be a son from one of the sisters. At the moment we can't find him on a family tree, but the story now maybe that he added the details of Brigitte being a teacher at the school, although she did not exist at all. We don't know then who is the drama teacher directing the play in May 1993 and apparently Emmanuel did not meet her there because she didn't exist and wasn't a teacher there? This is a crazy story and we still don't like watching anything with Owens but Alain Trogneux does have a Wikipedia page.

We agree that a notice in the paper for the birth of Brigitte is not proof of her birth. It is a strange things to provide as proof. Even more so as this is a birth certiciate for Jean Michel. With the accusations there would be a birth certificate for Jean Michel but not Brigitte because she does not exist - apparently. Yet if an investigation can locate Jean Michel's birth certificate, why hasn't Owens looked for Brigitte's?

The question now is did the Macrons provide enough proof?

We think that by not providing the birth certificate for Brigitte is not providing enough proof. However, the rest of what they provided might be.

"The conspiracy theory claims that Jean-Michel Henri Trogneux disappeared in the 1980s. That’s not true. While Jean-Michel Trogneux is a very private person, he was actually seen on television with French President Emmanuel Macron on 14 May 2017!

Jean Michel married in 1981. A journalist named Moadab obtained a copy of this administrative document, which appears to show that Brigitte attended her brother’s wedding to Véronique Christine Dominique.

Could both Jean-Michel and Brigitte Trogneux have attended the wedding as the same person at the same time? That would be quite the miracle! The copy of that certificate exists.

Jonathan Moadab asked two different friends of Jean-Michel Trogneux, who never met each other, to confirm that that man in the video was Jean-Michel Trogneux. Both persons “vigorously stated that Jean-Michel Trogneux existed, and that he was the man in those images“.

Finally, Jonathan Moadab went to Jean-Michel Trogneux’s house, and rang his doorbell. Naturally, Jean-Michel was not happy to see him, and asked him to leave. But he actually met the man himself, and confirmed that he does indeed exist." This is from an article.

This is a picture of Jean Michel and Brigitte, an unattractive photo of Brigitte but they are the same height. In several photos sshe seems to have a long face with a fairly hard jawline, so it is better for her not have her hair too short and as it is in this photo.

Film from 2018 with interview of friends of Brigitte, family film etc. It is French and currently we don't have sound, but good to see.

Watch short family home movies clip.

To answer a point that Owens has just added on to her many continuing accusations, Brigitte does not have especially big hands. She is quite fine boned with veryfine boned ankles and knees (which we commented on eslewhere.)

This link shows Brigitte's hands. Link. Owens may be able to say that in the clip she showed Brigitte's hand to her, looked big, But did she check and compare it with other clips and photos before saying that the hands were a man's hands? Or was this a disregard for the truth? A new accusation well after the lawsuit was issued.

With the story of the Trogneux family chocolate business it did begin in 1897 and Amiens is famous for terrible battles in WW1 and apparently again in 1940. Even so they rebuild cities. France surrendered very easily in WW2 and there would not have been a problem rebuilding and opening their shops again. They did have many shops, and not just in Amiens. Owens is questioning their chocolate business now. Perhaps it didn't exist?

This episode, the one we are looking at is current and it is not pleasant watching Owens or her beady eyes and facial expressions! She is unbelievably vicious., not tenacious and professional, but vicious and doing it for blood. This is a full on deeply aggressive campaign of hate from a person who is seething with hate for what she believes is 'evil' everywhere. . We understand that investigating this is important to her, but it is difficult to witness this response. It should be noted that in our understanding the 'white hats' are already well on top of the situation and the world is right now changing from 'evil' to 'good'. The 'evil empire' is well on its way to collapsing. There is no need for this level of hatred. There is no need for this level of hatred. Owens on X.

Internet Comments - Obviously this has spurred on excitement for digging into this!

"CANDACE READ THIS !!!! I work in the printing industry and looked at the newspaper from 1953 that the clip was taken from - There are 2 strange things - there are no other copies and if you ask Grok it says you need to contact the french Archives - AND MOST IMPORTANTLY - The type that was used for Brigitte name is BOLD and if you you at the rest of that papers page - that font is NOT used anywhere else - which in 1953 they did not do this because it would require a huge process to implement a different type-style (not like today) they would have had to set up a different line of type to be "stripped" into the film before exposing the file to a plate (they did not have computers to do this back then they would have used something line a line-o-type machine to generated the type and then pasted into place - and you could not change font like that in that archaic system - Confirm it for yourself !!!!"

"Candace - I am a former Records Manager and Archivist - and even before you raised some doubts about the veracity of the 1953 birth notice, I had already decided that WITH THE RESOURCES OF A STATE it would absolutely be possible to re-create an authentic looking (vintage style) birth notice and INSERT it into the archived records of a trivial, regional newspaper. This would be CHILD'S PLAY for a state intelligence agency. However... it would be much more difficult to re-create a fake birth certificate BECAUSE BIRTH CERTIFICATES ARE USUALLY NUMBERED INTO A SEQUENCE, and of course you can't create a new number when all the 1953 numbers are taken. With that said, because you are dealing with state intelligence, they could even remove the number of a deceased person and re-assign that number to a fake BC. I am afraid you need to be prepared for this type of event. They can do almost anything - and then call you a crazy conspiracy theorist for suggesting that documents have been tampered."

Plant Food Natural Health Contact