. Best viewed on anything but Google

Are the Macrons Going for the Massive Payout they can get on their Defamation Lawsuit

against podcaster Candace Owens?

$200,000,000 in damages? Or the $900,000,000 Alex Jones was successfully sued for?

Their lawyer has said in an interview that the Macrons are seeking damages.

This has been a more than 'a dream come true' handed to them on a plate, where they have been accused of almost everything imagineable.

People are allowed to have their opinions, to ask questions, and to 'free speech', but there are limits when that extends into harassment,, online stalking, defamation, and bullying.

It is speculated that they will be going for a substantial payout, far more than the net worth of Owens herself, but possibly an amount that will also wipe out her husband. He has a net worth of up to $240 million.

It is unlikely they care about 'Discovery', and all those waiting for a dramatic 'reveal' in court, are living in a fantasy world. This lawsuit has been brought for the damages that will be awarded.

Probably never in legal history has there ever been a case like this. The Macrons have allowed Owens to go as far as she can go on this and the amount they can ask for in damages increased each time Owens added more.

They have consistently requested retractions. They have taken every step correctly. No-one of the family has given interviews because they are not lawyers. It is always safer to stay silent. Except Brigitte's daughter Thiphaine who is a lawyer. Why should they say anything when Owens kept making the accusations more and more damaging?

And yes, a blood test will prove it 'once and for all' but why do that until there is such an overwhelmingly strong case for defamation that it can be shown in court?

The comments in the section beneath almost all videos on the Macrons, including completely unrelated nice stories, proves that significant damage has been done. Each time the supporters add their negative comments which echo that they have completely accepted that what Owens has said is factual, makes Owens' position worse. People making comments even refer to implied murders. This is now what many people think and believe.

People (in the comments section under videos) appear to think the Macrons are in some kind of desparate move to stop 'Owens telling the truth' that 'Brigitte is a man', but the lawsuit is for the fabulous amount they can claim in damages because of Owens saying it. More correctly it is the amount of accusations and the seriousness of them. These go far beyond 'free speech'. And far beyond 'an opinion'. Owens produced merchandise on this 'opinion' despite that the Macrons have provided adequate proof that Brigitte is Brigitte.

People are excited about everything going to 'Discovery'.

Without doubt the Macrons and their lawyers are aware that it is easy for Owens to simply say, maybe even the first request, that she would like the blood test results. As everyone has pointed out, it wouldn't take more than a blood test to prove this.. If this was going to prove something they could not prove, the Macrons would have stayed quiet about it.

If not, the Macrons could be just one day in court, with the jury they have demanded, and be 'exposed' by a simple blood test being requested at the outset. An 'oops, we didn't think of that' moment. We suspect the Macrons and their lawyers have enough intelligence to work that one out.

Legal experts say they think this won't go to trial but will be settled out of court.

The Macrons have provided the proof. But if that is still disputed as inconclusive, all the Macrons need to do is turn up with Brigitte and her brother, with full ID verified, at a court house. Or/and they could provide the blood test results, and then negotiate how much they can get in damages.

If they couldn't do one or both of these things then they and their lawyers would be recognised as incompetent amateurs, also ruining the reputation of the law firm.

They could be going for an amount in the region of $200,000,000 in damages.

Some have mentioned the $900,000,000 Alex Jones was successfully sued for. And that he has to pay. Lets hope they don't go for more.

(We are creating a separate page featuring the comments people have made on this case. 'Candy Comments') There are many issues raised with this story, the least of which is about Brigitte accused of being transgender - which is not of massive interest anyway. It is the other issues and comments which raise discussion.There is incest, implications of being involved in murder, and 'identity theft'.

Presumably 'Identity Theft' would invalidate the Macron's marriage too, if Emmanuel had married Jean Michel who had stolen the ID of his sister Brigitte!

Here are a few comments, added to show a point.

"I'm sure Candace would apologize publicly and then the lawsuit would be dropped. So far she hasn't so I'm on Candace's side until there's real proof."

Oh that the Macrons would allow it to be that simple! We doubt it. Why should they drop the lawsuit?

This person and millions of others can be 'on her side' as much as they like, but the Macrons have been handed the 'defamation case from heaven' and they are going for the maximum they can get from it.

It is too late for Candace Owens to apologize or step back on her accusations. She has already proved that she would continue.

It is only because of the Defamation lawsuit that she is beginning to step back.

It is too late. The Macrons have their case.

"Is Candace Owens even aware of how serious the lawsuit against her is?"

She definitely has not been aware, but her lawyers will be briefing her, and she is apparently beginning to step back on this.

Unfortunately people in the comments section beneath videos on this, think that those explaining the legal case here, think those saying she can't win think 'Owens cannot prove Brigitte is a man'. So they are angry and saying the legal experts are not paying attention to the documentary.

They say 'they're with Candace' as if the person explaining the legal situation has not understood (or 'believed') the documentary.

That isn't what the lawsuit is.

And there are the endless comments about 'grooming a "child"'.

Emmanual Macron.

Let's say this. This young man knows exactly the type of girl he wants to ask out. He isn't going to be fooled or misled by a mid 40's man dressed in drag.

. Best viewed on anything but Google

Are the Macrons Going for the Massive Payout they can get on their Defamation Lawsuit

against podcaster Candace Owens?

$200,000,000 in damages? Or the $900,000,000 Alex Jones was successfully sued for?

People are excited about everything going to 'Discovery'.

They could be going for an amount in the region of $200,000,000 in damages.

"I'm sure Candace would apologize publicly and then the lawsuit would be dropped. So far she hasn't so I'm on Candace's side until there's real proof."

This person and millions of others can be 'on her side' as much as they like, but the Macrons have been handed the 'defamation case from heaven' and they are going for the maximum they can get from it.

It is too late for Candace Owens to apologize or step back on her accusations. She has already proved that she would continue.

It is only because of the Defamation lawsuit that she is beginning to step back.

It is too late. The Macrons have their case.

Candy Comments (much more to be added.)

'Project Sitting Duck'.

Brigitte

Brigitte 2

Brigitte 2 Part 2 contines