Mdm Brigitte Macron Sues Candace Owens.
It is hoped they have the material to succeed with this, as defamation is a terrible and extremely harmful issue. We take note of all the 'negative' ones who jump on the bandwagon of condemning another. Again there is the 'Benny Show' with no end to the evil things being thrown at the person being attacked here, and the endless comments of judgmental people beneath the youtube videos.
We are not saying we know one way or the other, but commenting on the evil of how people sit in judgment and do not respond with empathy, compassion, understanding and an open mind before condemning.
CNN report.
Owens has made a new episode of her programme this time commenting on being sued and spewing out hatred and aggression. But then, she is a "Christian" and has the right to be like this. In her programme on being sued, she remains the same rude, insulting person we have already been shocked by. It has to be realised that this is not limited to being an accusation that Mdm Macron is allegedly transgender but within that context there are some extremely unsavoury things Mdm Macron is also accused of being.
In addition Owens is making extremely unkind, even vicious personal comments about how Brigitte Macron looks - which is pretty darned fantastic for a lady of 72 years old. It seems Owens is going to continue in this unquestionably unprofessional manner, most likely now adding more, and increasing the claim of those suing her for damages, because she has never provided any proof of anything, yet still carries on in the same defamatory and insulting way.
The claim is that Brigitte was born a man, but my understanding is that Owens has been shown the proof with the birth certificate that Brigitte was born female. If a person then continues with the same defamatory comments even though they have been shown the proof, then doing that is defamation. Ironically, even Owens' in answer to the lawsuit, mentions that in the US it is about the person defaming another then continuing to defame after being shown the proof - and she is still doing it in that same broadcast.
If I was the Macrons I would wait until this woman has incrimminated herself, then go in with the lawsuit in the USA with all the proof anyone could ever ask for. Not of course for providing a 'simple answer' that this woman has no right to 'demand' anyway, but for the maximum turning of the screws for what this insolent youtuber has done. Hopefully that is what they did. Owens needs to be called out on doing something like this.
I don't want to add a link to her programme. We understand she has been shown the proof that Brigitte was born a woman, and that Brigitte Macron is the same Brigitte. She has not only been asked by the President of France to stop making defamatory accusations, but has also been asked by the President of the USA to stop doing it, yet she continues.
In my own opinion Owens is horrible to watch and radiates a nasty but also very spoilt personality. Someone who may have grown up as everyone's darling and thus believes she is. The lawyers for the Macrons seem to think Owens will continue to double down and her every move probably works increasingly in their favour.
She additionally accuses Brigitte of being a bully, accuses her of bullying her husband - presumably her husband does not agree because he is the one suing Owens - and she accuses Brigitte of grooming her husband, and she makes this accusation with real malice in her eyes, so for her it is the 'truth', even though it isn't. She expresses astonishment that they would fly to the USA for this lawsuit, but would not have her fly to France to interview them. Why would the President of France be manipulated into giving an interview to a nobody, not qualified in journalism, online influencer with a podcast?
That statement was about angling to get an interview with the President of France and his wife, to discuss what gender his wife is and send her ratings sky high. That is what that was about. Being in the US for the lawsuit is a very different matter
If Owens conducted an interview, she has already displayed the same type of insolence as Meghan Markle displayed to the Royal Family and the late Queen.
Owens has basically said to them, through her legal team, that she has offered them some questions and an interview, and because they ignored her demands and did not reply, she is going to continue with the defamation, including that she might do a second series -
if you, the President of France, do not answer her demands for answers.
Do you see what is wrong here?!
Do people with an online presence really have the right to do this kind of thing to someone when they feel like it? Do people have the right to say wrongful things about another, things that will damage peoples' lives, including insults, and there is no recourse for this? That would be a shocking reflection on our world.
.
Take A Look At This First. .
 ‘You were born a man, you will die a man’: Candace Owens DOUBLES DOWN after Macron lawsuit
Watch 3 mins. It is worth noting this woman's extreme level of driven insistence on this. This is absolutely not normal for a professional "investigative journalist". She's done the series, they've filed a lawsuit. Why is Owens saying this?
She shows a photo of Brigitte, then asks if you need any more evidence she is a man. The answer is probably yes. A photo of Brigitte now at 72 is not evidence.
*The defamation case filed in France earlier was filed by two people. Brigitte and the brother Jean Michel. A person cannot file a lawsuit if they do not exist. It also can't be one person pretending to be two people.
Candace Owens SUED By President Macron of France.
Firstly, if a person was transgender and all the dreadful things Mdm Macron has been accused of, then you would keep quiet and let it pass.
If you are NOT these things then you would absolutely take this court, and if that failed, you would continue to fight for justice.
This is a huge issue because none of us who are female may be able to 'prove' we were born female if someone like Candace Owens decides to not believe it. Because that is what this is. This work is on the side of justice.
However, it is difficult to prove something like this in a US court, which should be very worrying for everyone.
The case is not about proving if what Owens said was true,
it is about whether they can prove Owens had 'RECKLESS DISREGARD for the truth'.
The Macron's lawyers have said that Owens has been shown the proof, and if she continues to 'recklessly disregard' that, then she proves the issue of why she is being sued. The Macrons should be able to win this case.
Immediately after learning she is being sued, Owens is presenting another podcast making all the same claims again. See the 3 minute video above. It isn't her immediate podcast after learning she was being sued, but she did say exactly the same things.
To continue in this manner would seem that Owens thinks she is defending that her claims are true, despite that she has been given proof they are not true. .That does look like a 'reckless disregard for the truth'.
Owens has stated that she would stake her entire career on this story, regardless of all the evidence to the contrary which was requested. That is, there is proof that her claims are false, and she is still continuing. The case would appear to meet the standard of 'reckless disregard for truth'. The other case for defamation is that Owens intentionally lied. Owen's almost fanatical broadcasts on this seem to indicate she is convinced it is true despite all and every evidence to the contrary.
Mdm Macron's birth certificate has been provided along with many photos from her childhood showing the little girl Brigitte existed. For Madame Macron to be the brother as a transgender figure, there has to be some account for what happened to the little girl, in order to be 'replaced' by her brother, as she has not died.
We considered adding a video commentary, but it needs to be constructive. We do learn some points though.
The accusations against Mdm Macron are considerably more serious than if she is transgender, and the male presenter of the vidoe we wanted to add seems to be completely missing this. There are opinions to what degree slander such as has been promoted by Owens can hurt and upset a person. It is not possible to calculate the suffering that someone can be put through by something such as this. It becomes bullying and one of the outcomes of bullying can be suicide. What Owens is doing, is bullying.
The birth certificate was released, and people said if they had done that in the first place, this would never have continued. But the birth certificate has been released and it is still continuing.
Owens has a social media post still saying she 'stakes her entire reputation as a jounalist' on this, (she is not a qualified journalist and this is proven by her 'Becoming Brigitte' series which we have watched). She continues to say she has 'never seen anything like this in in her life' referring to the lawsuit. Interesting, as the lawyers have said that they do expect her to continue, with the added note that by continuing after being given the proof otherwise, that is defamation. She was expected to continue.
It is true that public figures do get derogatory comments, and there are unkind comments on Trump and his wife, but there is nothing that equals what this is, especially as this relates to respectable French families and in the consciousness that is particularly 'French'. The Trump family was never 'respectable'. It is possible Owens made good comments on the Israel situation as the male presenter says, but that has nothing to do with the accusations against Mdm Macron. Perhaps this male presenter has a crush on Owens. He also agrees with some of what she says which is really based on prejudice, and could definitely be a bias..
However, we learn from him that Owens is 'filthy rich' and married to a very wealthy man, which probably explains a great deal. But if he is wealthy, is it possible she is promoting views that any wealthy donor can expect of those he is financing?
As for the male presenter, he does seem to have missed the point when he says,"get a thicker skin lady". The accusations are horrifically worse than just about 'transgender' and there is little doubt that Owens is making this a very vicious and even personal attack on the Macrons.
There is a point why this sort of thing is allowed to happen at all, and perhaps there is no legal recourse available. In some countries it is against the law to insult the monarch or leader and perhaps this is a fair rule. Look how people use this 'loophole' to destroy others in business and politics. Look at how Trump constantly uses this response.
Overall, I wanted to use this news source, but the male presenter has lessened my opinion of the value of the news source which needs to be unbiased and fair.
I watched the 'Becoming Brigitte' series as a person who only knew the name of Owens but had never seen her work. I found it very difficult to watch how she was presenting the information. My immediate impression was that it was unprofessional journalisim, and that it amounted to what seemed like a personal vendetta. It was presented with outright malice and with prejudice. It was very difficult to watch the series. I have since done more research. My impression has been that Owens overrates her importance, and relevance as a "journalist", in the same way that Meghan Markle overrated her 'value' to the British Royal Family and then to the world. Owens is demanding the President of a country answer to her as if she is from 60 Minutes, not an online content creator. The photos we have of Brigitte were never shown when the series was presented. A pretty young woman with her first child for example.
It also seems likely that Owens is some kind of 'fundamentalist Christian'. Anyone who has experienced some of that kind of attitude, will recognise an issue that may also be present here.
Here's some information on Owens' husband.
"George Thomas Stahel Farmer (born 15 December 1989) is a British-American entrepreneur and businessman. He is the former chairman of Turning Point UK and the former CEO of Parler and Parlement Technologies. He's the devout Christian founder of the controversial Parler app, After reports surfaced that Parler was allegedly used to coordinate the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, the app was removed from large platforms, including Apple, Amazon and Google.
Farmer asked Owens to marry him during a FaceTime call on Dec. 29, 2018, just 17 days after meeting her for the first time.The whirlwind romance meant Owens and Farmer did not date before getting engaged.
“We hadn't gone on a date. We had not talked about marriage or the future or anything,” Farmer told Fradd. “It was very much a God thing. The Lord was in control of that whole process.”
*Owens says she stakes her entire reputation on the Brigitte Macron story, and continues with personal insults on the appearance of Mdm Macron and her family. She also continues with comments and accusations about how she first met Emmanual.
In France the legal age of consent is 15 which means in December of 1992 he was 15. But what is not shown is that Brigitte at that time was a very young looking and very pretty lady who a lot of teenage boys were likely to have a crush on.
It is a matter of perspective. If you represent Brigitte as a 40 year old not so attractive transgender who decided to groom a 15 year old boy, the story could look one way.
If you saw that it was actually a very pretty, young looking, slim woman who many of the boys had a crush on, then that is another matter.
Legal opinion on this. (Lional Nation) Comment says 'show us a picture of Brigitte as a young woman with her baby" so we have included that.
"See you in court!" Candace Owens fires back at Brigitte Macron.
Piers Morgan weighs in that Owens is going to be owing the Macrons many, many millions because of her accusations. Most of the informed opinions are that she will be 'going down' for this.
Vicious crazy eyed hate filled broadcasts continue from Owens. It is most likely that the Macrons would not have sued without very firm evidence behind them. Yet there are many fans who think Owens is a 'truth seeking' journalist for all of whatever she presents, despite that this does seem to be a witch hunt against the Macrons. All of them believe that there are powerful 'elites' who 'get away' with things, and now barely educated Candace Owens is going to expose this crime, and probably can't wait for the accolades coming her way.
To us we don't see a 'truth seeking warriour'. We just don't. Maybe that is because of the way she does this. We see a spoilt woman who wants fame, wants her own way, and has vicious 'fundamentalist' viewpoints where 'everyone' is evil except for "Christians" who follow the Bible.
Owens appears to epitomize the kind of religious based hatred and evil that is poisoning this planet. It is hoped the Macrons do have all the evidence they need and in the legal wording that can be used to twist what a case is about. And why wouldn't they have the evidence. They have not provided many photos but maybe they have waited to see how far Owens will go with her accusations, before responding. That includes pedophilia, incest and perhaps she included murder. Would she hang herself?
It is very likely they have hundreds of photos of the brother and sister together and throughout Brigitte's younger life. This is a crazy allegation to make and to pursue so viciously, and with the hate and prejudice simply oozing out of her. Even if she was basically right, none of this is correct way to go about it.
What would be appropriate justice for this? Damages in the many millions, maybe hundreds of millions, and a prison sentence for Candace Owens.
|