. Best viewed on anything but Google

.

Jan. 20th

The Brigitte Macron story about being a man is not a proven reality. She had two older brothers and one died a few years ago, but the other brother still lives in the family town, as far as reports say. Both he and Brigitte brought legal cases against those who created the story about Brigitte's gender. French journalists, real, actually qualified ones, did follow up the story and reported they went round to the brother's house (Jean Michel) he was there but politely asked them to leave. Until there is definitive proof there is no proof.

Even if she was a he when she met Emmanuel Macron he was the legal age for France and Brigitte was not his teacher. She was a drama coach for an out of school project. This is the available information. It will be interesting to find out.

Brigitte does walk 'roughly' and does sit down 'roughly' almost as if she wants controversy. However she is in her 70's and it is difficult to walk in high heels. It is curious that they are not providing DNA evidence or a blood test but that can be saved for the actual trial. Both the Macrons would be very silly to have taken this to court for defamation if they knew brigitte could not prove she was a woman. Another explanation for this, for them suing for defamation, is that these are not the actual original Macrons and they are being 'exposed' as part of a weird religious cult that elites were part of.

Commentators do change their views after they see the series 'Becoming Brigitte' although it is not a very professional "documentary" and it didn't convince us. Not that we are particularly interested. However, it should be noted that there are reports that there is kompramet on Tucker Carlson, and that is another reason people 'alter their views'.

However, none of it is as bad as Trump's past and his association with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein and also Robert Maxwell, and the overall connection with Czechoslovakia as the hub country of a Mossad espionage operation.

Jan. 18th.

Macron v. Owens: Analyzing Candace Owens’ Motion to Dismiss

Watch 8 mins. "Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron have sued Candace Owens in Delaware over her “Becoming Brigitte” series, and now that all the moving papers on the motion to dismiss are available, California attorney Nick Brooks walks you through what they really say and what’s at stake. The Macrons claim Owens told her audience that Brigitte was actually born male, is secretly her brother Jean‑Michel Trogneux using a stolen identity, and that the couple committed identity theft, fraud, incest, and were tied to CIA‑style conspiracies and violence against journalists—allegations they say are categorically false.

In this video, Nick breaks down Owens’ motion to dismiss, the Macrons’ opposition, and the reply, focusing on personal jurisdiction over Owens, Delaware’s long‑arm and manager‑consent statutes, and how her Delaware entities factor into that analysis. He also examines Owens’ statute of limitations and forum non conveniens arguments—especially her attempt to import France’s three‑month defamation period through Delaware’s borrowing statute—and explains why timing may be more dangerous for the Macrons than jurisdiction. You’ll hear how the amended‑complaint and Rule 15 issue could lead the judge to strike some allegations rather than kill the case, why targeted jurisdictional discovery would undercut Owens’ effort to avoid scrutiny of her business model, and a prediction about what the Delaware court is likely to do at this motion‑to‑dismiss stage."

Jan.10th

Since the French court case, there have been opposing views on the verdict. The case in France was more about the laws in France which allowed online bullying. The case against Candace Owens is very different as she has accused the Macrons of incest and murder. The Macrons can still produce the DNA tests or anything else required which would answer these accusations. because Owens did not simply allege the Macrons had committed murder, she stated it as factual information because they wanted to cover up Brigitte's gender.

If Brigitte proves she is and was born a woman then they do not have anything to 'cover up. This then relates to the monetizing of the information Owens gives out as being factual journalistic news, when it isn't. The question also is, can a person with 5 million subscribers accuse someone of murder based on information that was already shown to be untrue, and make money from that accusation? Making money being the real issue.

Also the accusation that Brigitte is her husband's father, which makes the relationship incest. Is it right that Owens can make money from very publicaly saying such an accusation as being fact? Especially when it isn't.

Macrons Win BIG: ‘Born a Man’ Theory COLLAPSES, Paris Court Convicts 10 in Brigitte Smear Case

Watch 7 mins. For the Macrons v Owens defamation lawsuit, Owens is going for the "she really believed it" defense.

There are two considerably more important issues in play regardless of whether Brigitte Macron is a man or a woman.

Firstly that huge numbers of people are relying on a 'mum in a basement' running her own business as a podcaster, as their source of NEWS. Owens in not a qualified or trained journalist nor does she have the resources to gather actual, accurate news. If there is an issue, then it can be investigated. But to accuse and judge as if one is the law, that is not at all the same thing.

Secondly, it is of considerable importance to recognize that there is a problem if anyone anywhere believes they have a 'right' to slander and defame others and consider it 'a bit of humour' or justified. In fact they are doing this BECAUSE of the publicity of the first problem. These 'satires' are extremely damaging and offensive to anyone, and if people had the 'right' to do this, then the world would be hell to live in. A free for all hell. Anyone can attack anyone that they have targeted either to ruin them, or to monetize doing this to them. They can destroy a person's career, their right to a promotion because they have defamed the person, and they can do that so they get the promotion instead, and they can cause such hurt that people have committed suicide because of it. They can mistake a person's disability for being something else which is entirely wrong - and this is something that has happened to me. There is very little you can do when someone sets out to slander you. They can make up 'news' and fake reporting actual facts. Then if people do do things like this, it leads governments to bring in more laws that seek to address this kind of thing. If people do not choose to, or simply cannot behave as decent citizens then it leads to more laws and restrictions.

Macron Trouble For Candace?

Watch 12 mins.

Jan. 5th.

Paris court convicts 10 over cyberbullying of France’s first lady Brigitte Macron

PARIS: A Paris court found 10 people guilty of the cyberharassment of France’s first lady, Brigitte Macron, for spreading false claims she is a transgender woman who was born male, French media reported.

The eight men and two women were found guilty of making malicious comments about Brigitte Macron’s gender and sexuality, even equating her age difference with her husband to “paedophilia”. They were handed sentences of up to eight months with suspended jail time, France Info reported.

Speaking with TF1 on Sunday night, Brigitte Macron defended her fight against cyberbullies, hoping it would be an example to others. She lamented that her attackers ignored the strong evidence of her gender.“A birth certificate is not nothing. It is a father or a mother who goes to declare their child, who says who he is or who she is,” she said.

The Candace Owens defamation case is now next. Owens has accused Brigitte Macron and her husband the French President, of incest, and murder, based on her podcast programme's 'clickbait journalism' that Brigitte was a man named Jean Michel who is her brother, and is actually still alive.

The malicious conspiracy theory plaguing the French President and his wife | The Brief

Watch 11 mins. 60 Minutes Australia and 9 News Australia.

"It's the defamation trial crossing the Atlantic. How has a conspiracy theory about the wife of the French President, Brigitte Macron, which is being peddled by right-wing comentator Candice Owens become so viral? "

Plant Food Natural Health Contact