How A Teacher Fell In Love With A Student And Became The First Lady. Brigitte Macron
I don't care what anyone says, I really love this love story! Macron at 15 or 16 is such a real French looking boy, that is the look. And I think that Brigitte is very attractive and stunning. I don't know if Macron is a 'bad' leader or not. Vive l'amour. This is a lovely love story. Watch 9 mins.
The internet comments are the real crime, how quickly people judge others so horribly. Of course they are mostly from Americans who simply do not understand the French. He was not underage, and they did fall in love. But that age is when they met. Anyone can see they are happy, and they are still together! These people making judgments do not understand a 15 year old French boy, and how naively stupid it is to insist she 'groomed' him. It would have been him going after her, just as Macron has said. One self-righteous older woman, probably American - another one who can't stop making unkind remarks about people who are happy - says 'it's disgusting'. Why? He is now 47 and they are still happily married. Who are these people making comments on something that is NONE of their business. I like this video too. Watch 8 mins. *She wasn't his teacher. She was the person overseeing a separate drama group, which was producing a play.
Hopefully the really dark stories spread about Macron are not the reality. People making those horrible comments are the ones who are called 'sheeple' who all follow everyone else and don't think for themselves. They will all gang up on someone who has been targeted. I hate it.
But if this is the love story that is presented, then doesn't it teach the current world a lesson?
No-one is ever going to find a true love if the moment something goes wrong, they run off to someone else. Especially if they are so cheap they will sleep with anyone because they THINK 'it's ONLY sex'. They make it the same level as a bathroom visit. Either you choose to make it have value and you choose for the person you would have as your partner to have VALUE or it will never have value. There aren't loads of 'beautiful girls' or 'good looking guys' they don't exist.
What you have to find is the RIGHT PERSON!
Macron overcame all obstacles and found real happiness in love.
"We will do a separate page on this story because it is quite involved. At the current time we were focussing on a love story and also how easily people turn to 'gossip' and the 'reptile' auto response of people once they have been given a story but not actual proof.
As for people grouping into wild animal packs against another person ........
I remember when the South African disabled athlete Oscar Pistorius was convicted for the shooting death of his girlfriend.
The evidence was not there that he did this as 'domestic violence' and I believe it was a Valentine's date anyway. A security guard had just done the rounds moments before and everything was silent. There was no argument happening. He was ruled 'not guilty' by the judge then this was challenged and he was convicted on a technicality, that it was because he shot the person, any person at all, even thinking it was an intruder.
I was staying at a 'girl's only' accommodation in Australia but there were a lot of older women there, and what I hated was how they were judging and condemning this man without any regard to the circumstances, or that he did not shoot his girlfriend in an argument (it wasn't that, but they still seemed to view it as being that).
My point is why these people hate and judge others like this without real evidence? I believe it was an accidental shooting and an extremely traumatic experience for Oscar to have seen what he actually did. There was a neighbour doctor there within minutes and Oscar was sobbing in anguish and despair. That was punishent enough. But there are people who hate so much and want blood.
There are a lot of people in the world who are like that, and I meet a lot of them!
Candace Owens Has Questions About Brigitte Macron
Disgusting 'journalism'. This is a youtube video but the video is not added. (You can check the title if you want to see the video clip). There is no story here. This is someone's private life and categorically Emmanuel was NOT underage in France! This is bad journalism and unfair. Definitely there is plenty of cabal related stuff but that has nothing to do with this topic. It is their private lives and he was NOT underage for France, Owens says the team sent the French President a series of questions to answer about his wife. Answer Yes or No. Really! They sent the President of France a set of questions about his private life. For what reason? So they will know?
If any of the basic things claimed by 'gutter journalism' are the case, then it is none of anyone's business because it is about people's private lives. But they are saying far worse than what that is anyway. Firstly though, Brigitte's daughter was in the same class as Macron, so the same age. How many children did she give birth to the year her daughter was born? Secondly, 'they' are saying she was really born in 1945 because that's when the brother was born. That makes her around 80 years old now.
They (Macron and Brigitte) weathered all the obstacles and finally did marry. Even in the film taken while they were rehearsing or staging the play they were doing. it does show he, Macron, gave Brigitte a kiss on the cheek. In the photos of Macron at the age he was, he is a good looking French boy but not at all a child. Whatever the entirety of the story is, they married 15 years later and they are still married. That means this is no-one else's business and their opinions don't count.
***Just a notation here, but I am actually having difficulty with watching how very unprofessional this presentation is. That is not saying that the investigation itself is wrong. The presentation of this unfolding and inconclusive investigation is unprofessional.
There is an interview with the actual French journalist who did the research, Xavier Poussard
and it is the information he provided that we have worked from, not from Candace Owens' unbelievably unprofessional series, where she narrates everything from an obvious pre-formed opinion and as if it is self-righteous gossiping. If this was supposed to be presenting real journalism then she has broken all the rules from the start. She is supposed to be presenting the case, not being judge and jury.
She also seems to forget that this is the President and First Lady of France.
They aren't going to answer little forms from an online nobody (to be honest). This is not a serious journalistc programme or anything. Owens also seems to forget that with this 'investigation' if Brigitte speaks to her ex- sister-in-law and says don't get involved, this isn't just her sister-in-law. This is the wife of the French Presidentsaying something. She is important and has power. Not threats, but she is the First Lady of France. This is also why she would not go to the funeral of her first husband and also why it was very private. Candace Owens is extremely disrespectful and one could imagine that the 'Elysee Palace' are appalled by this disrespect to the highest office in the French nation.
Soul-Mates from a previous Life Time.
Who are any of us to make a judgment on this? Photo from the school play where they met.
The basic premise is that Brigitte's older brother Jean-Michel was born in February 1945 and replaced his sister Brigitte
who was born a full 8 years later in April 1953. She did go to school and she did marry in 1974, but by 1977 the brother has become Brigitte and the real Brigitte has disappeared. Thereafter she does go to Algeria in 1981 as part of her study to become a teacher, and in 2007 she marries the current President of France. For that marriage, if she is actually the older brother, she would have been 62 years old and now in 2025 she is 80.
We do not think the current First Lady of France is, or looks, 80 years old.
But Brigitte was born in 1953 and she does exist. This is about 10 seconds of Brigitte Macron arriving at a fashion show last September. Watch.
In 1980 Jean-Michel gets married, and Brigitte is the witness. 1982 Jean-Michel fathered a son. This is the one whose looks are similar to Emmanuel macron yet obviously isn't him. He doesn't look like a twin image or anything, He is definitely much less good looking than Emmanuel. Not sure what the doco is getting to with that, but something about whether the wife or Jean Michel is something to do with the real birth family of Macron, which was in 1977. In 1981 Brigitte is apparently at college in Algeria as part of doing her teaching degree.
There is a marriage certificate for Brigitte's first marriage in 1974, when she was 21. Her brother, who people are trying to prove is Brigitte herself, was the Best Man.
For this reason they have to discredit that she is the bride. However, the wedding photo does look like her as she probably was at 21, because people do change how they look by the time they get to 40 and then 70!
There is also film of the rehearsals for the school play they were doing when they met. Some of it is in one of the video links on this page, and in another youtube on this topic there is more of that film.
Her name is on the class lists for her own school attendance.
Another point the doco made was that there are no photos from school or childhood, at least not provided. However she was a teacher at a school and teaching Latin as well as Literature and Drama. She must have a degree to have got that job. In the journalists research they discovered that the young Brigitte at school did exist as did her brother. Her name is down on the class lists. The brother is also much older and would be 80 now and it is unlikely that Brigitte is 80.
Also Amiens is a small town, which means plenty of gossip, and the family was established there with a chocolate business. Why were there no comments on irregularities with Brigitte? Where did her 3 children come from if they are not hers, given that one of them (who looks like Brigitte) was in the same class with Macron.
Updated.
So, what is the 'dark story'? It is that Brigitte may in fact be the brother Jean-Michel who assumed her identity. He was born on February 11th 1945 and would be 80 this year. Brigitte does not seem to be 80 years old. Jean-Michel did spend his 'national service' .when aged 18, in Algeria in 1963. But their father had a sick note for the 'national service' that his son was in Algiers in 1981.
He is supposed to have fathered the father of Macron, who is now 47, so his father must have been born more than 67 years ago? Maybe 1958? He, Jean-Michel would have been 18 years old if Macron's father was around 20 when he fathered Macron. The journalist has said he was 24 when he fathered the father so that would have been 1969, and that person fathered Macron in 1977 so he was 11 years old. Maybe some of these dates are wrong!!
The section above is now corrected
because this documentary is saying that Brigitte as Jean Michel, fathered Emmanuel Macron, who is now her husband.
This is a nasty speculation that the doco is delighted about, and this part is covered in what Owens calls the conclusive episode of the series. It is the final episode and what she means is the concluding episode.
I am now paying much more attention to this.
Certainly the actual investigative journalist in France was probably very careful in what he did, but that cannot be said for this series.
I am watching the final episode, and another mistake Owens makes is commenting on why would every male in the family be called Jean? In France it is very common for every male to be prefaced by the name Jean. There are Jean-Claudes, Jean-Lucs, Jean-Jacques and so on, just as almost every female has a 'Marie' attached to her name. And another mistake is that Claude in a girl's name in France is a girl's name. Owens is wondering why the name is included when it isn't her father's name. It is common in the names of French girls.
Owens also comments on the scarves Brigitte is wearing in the teacher photos. French women, like most elegant European women, always wear scarves in creative ways.
Next mistake, Owens is commenting that it is unusual to have a lot of names given. No it isn't. Not in France. In the family photo there is a sibling named Monique who Owens thinks looks like the 1989 photos of Brigitte. This sibling was born in 1941 so is even older than the brother. Perhaps the doco is saying that this girl is the 1989 photo attributed to Brigitte but Monique would be 48 at that time. (There is actual film of Brigitte with the drama group a bit later, and she does look like this.) Owens comments on Monique's hands in the photo but it looks like her hand is behind the chair and the odd bit is part of the decoration on the chair. It definitely looks as if her hand is behind the chair because of the angle of her arm. Incidentally, she married a billionaire car dealer - even apparently with claws for her left hand - and they did not supply this "investigation" with any photos.
Just a guess, but I would think this kind of thing is on the level of being an irritating mosquito. No-one at the level of society that this family is, is going to bother with providing this crew with anything .
Owens is repeatedly stating that the person who did provide the photos as someone who is "accused of" certain things, but was this person convicted of these allegations? As for supplying very few photos, why should any official photos be given to these 'journalists'? It is very common to have a paparazzi level of so called 'journalism'.
President Macron was asked by a journalist where his sister lives. He looks to Brigitte. Well, is he going to tell the journalist where his sister lives? He is the President, so she is the President's sister and could then be hounded by paparazzi. He could also be indicating to Brigitte "here we go again". It can be guaranteed that he isn't looking over to her to find out where his sister lives! The suggestion being inferred here is that Macron is looking to Brigitte as his father for how to answer the question. Does a man in his 40's anywhere, look to his father for how to answer questions?
Next she goes over to the Rothschilds who owned the bank Macron worked at, and they liked him. Maybe they are related. But Owens goes off into things about that family, and even Poussard the actual French journalist whose work is being presented says, its not to do with the Rothschilds. Yet Owens is framing it as if it is.
Then there are the ongoing insults about the appearance of people identified as relatives. She is describing the person said to actually be Jean-Michel as the 'little fat one' and 'little chubby one'. This is actually a living person and Owens is describing him in that way. Even if he is someone else, she is still insulting this person. She also suggests the sister Monique is the person in Brigitte's teacher photos and Owens is very rude about her looks. She insults the First Lady and she calls the President an idiot. That insult is because his co-workers, who probably resented his success, said things about him which may be slanderous.
At this time I am waiting to find out why the Macron side provided the 'conclusive' picture of Jean-Michel at 18. Why would they do that when it might be a photo of Brigitte? I am also more and more horrified with how bad this 'documentary' is being presented by this incompetent whatever she is. Is she qualified as a journalist or did she even study journalism? This presentation suggests that she is a fake.
So, Jean-Michel fathered his son in 1982 after his marriage in 1981. This makes their son 5 years younger than Emmanuel Macron is and although he does have a similarity in looks, he clearly isn't the same person.
Presumably the suggestion is, we think, that Jean-Michel had a relationship with the same woman he married, but it was in 1977 and what are they saying? That they also had a son then who became Emmanuel Macron? That is why the photos of his 1982 son look similar to, but nowhere near as attractive as Emmanuel Macron.
Apparently there is proof that Jean-Michel fathered a son in 1982. However, the documentary is also saying what is added above, and that Jean-Michel was a trans character in an interview on TV in 1977 named Veronque. At that time s/he - whoever that person interviewed was - was a woman although it isn't clear if that person had had an operation to physically transition. S/he does say she has a useless organ that has never been used. But now as a woman she can copulate but not procreate (as a woman.)
The photos shown of Macron's parents show people who are more like his grandparents age. Let's not forget that at 15 Macron was sent off to an elite school in Paris because of his attraction to Brigitte. he has said there was a lot of emotion at that time. I'll bet! It can be assumed that young Emmanuel was furious. He returned 3 years later at 18 and he and Brigitte began again.
They have shown a photo of the son, looking like the President and said he is Jean-Michel's son. The looks of that man are the link to Macron. But they are saying that Brigitte as Jean-Michel is actually Macron's father. It is very confusing. The man in the photo is not the same person as Macron.
In addition this journalist's investigation is suggesting that Bigitte Macron is the real President with Macron as the front for this. However, it is not necessary to be a wife or even seen as a known person to be the person who is really 'pulling the strings' of a puppet President. besides that, her background is in manufacturing chocolate, and then as a school teacher. Why suddenly control all of France by an unnecessary ruse?
In fact we are looking at this story, as it stands to date, focussing on the 'reptile' auto response of people once they have been given a story but not actual proof. The internet comments show people who all too quickly jump to judge negatively. The fact that they married and are still together is significant.
Overall, if this is factual that Brigitte is transgender then that is a private matter. There are no suggestions of the kinds of Pizzagate behaviour that is part of the Obama Deception. Until something of that kind is evident, then this is a private story of someone's marriage, and that should not be a gossip story once turned over to the 'reptile vultures' which DO make up the 'masses'.
At worst, it mostly looks more like Brigitte whose birthdate is consistent with her age now, somehow wanted to be her brother. The girl Brigitte was born in 1953 and she is female. Her name is on the school class lists.
Her birth family provided the photo which first showed the picture of an unknown boy. This is based on the photo being of the family, that is parents and children. But the boy in question was not identified. In fact he may have been a cousin or something because the photo includes another older woman who may have been a sister of one of the parents and the boy could have been her son. Later on the boy is named and has the same name as brigitte's father. Then apparently they made alterations to the photo. If they wanted to make a change like that, why weren't they more careful when providing that photo?
If this is a made up background as seems to be what is suggested, why make the mistake with the photo? Even more worth considering is why say they met when he was or 15 and she was 39 as this of course is going to lead to questions
If it is a made up story, why not just say he was 18 and she was 42?
Then there would not be anything to make a story out of?
It is also likely that someone deliberately gave the journalist his second prized picture of 'Jean Michel' which he has matched to Brigitte, but the photo was of Brigitte anyway. In addition, there is now film footage of the rehearsals for the play they were doing.
As her name is on the class school records, then so are the details of which grade she was in which makes her birthdate consistent with 1953. She does not look to be about 80 years old at this time now. But that would be the age of the boy.
Maybe she went to Algiers in 1981 to study, perhaps for her Teaching degree. 1981 is the year given by Proussard when 'someone' was in Algeria studying at college there. Some of her study was in Algeria. She would have been 28 and apparently the college in Algieria knew their student was Brigitte. She wasn't called Jean-Michel. She eventually returned to Amiens in France and began a teaching career in 1986 at a Catholic School there. Presumably she did not leave her family for the duration of getting her Teaching degree.
It is impossible for the boy 'Jean-Michel' to be doing the French national service at 18 by being in Algeria in 1981 because he, as even older than Brigitte, would have been 36.
These seem to be extraodinary mistakes on the part of the investigative journalists! Or is it being said that a male person took over the identity of Brigitte in those years before 1986?