The person asked what might have upset the girls who recently left, and was it him who upset them?
From the girls who left in disgust on Monday night my understanding is they plan to do independent reviews and inform the place they booked through. It is believed they had already posted photos and comments.
It was also how he spoke to the girls when they went out one Friday night, which was commenting on how they looked but said in a very sleazy way, and they did specifically mention that they had found it offensive. (I too remember that because I did hear it.) It was the coming back late at night drunk. It was about not being present on the property and again probably out drunk, and about what they said was immature behaviour.
From previous people it was complaints about the extremely vulgar talks taking place in the public area. It was the dog being allowed to roam the place and pee everywhere and anywhere, over luggage, in the dorms et cetera, but that nothing was done about it. Also that the dog was allowed to knock over all the rubbish and then was aggressive and almost went for anyone trying to stop him.
It was the intent to seduce guests and volunteers, or inappropriately touch them (which was told to others) and from what I was told, girls who were here earlier on, also left earlier than planned to move somewhere else because of that.
Their point - about all of this - was that these are guests or volunteers NOT people met in a club or bar.
Maybe the person is drunk at other times too. It was the loutish loud shouting both while drunk and when watching football matches. It was the other stuff beyond the weed, also bragging about it as if this person thinks it impresses people, along with the sexually explicit talks as if they impress people.
The girls who just left also said that there was a man and a woman brought back to the hostel on Sunday night, the person was off his head drunk, apparently with the woman in the bedroom, The man was in the TV area and was the only person I saw. The owner had some need to take off the trousers he was wearing.
As the owner was clearly running round in his underpants, then a small towel - while knowing someone was up on the balcony - then perhaps we have to guess what was happening there in the bedroom. When the girls left on Monday, they were commenting on the owner being loud and drunk and that there was a girl as well as the man, and the owner was in his underpants then a towel. Done while knowing there were other people on the balcony over the public area!
Personally, I thought the person had brought back the man for an 'encounter' - which would have been interesting if it was out in the public area. (Generally it does seem that the person may no longer maintain personal dignity about what he might do in public.)
Just remembered, also mentioned was that although this was after midnight that same night, and the street was empty and quiet, the person was seen marching about in the street in his underpants. (Don't know if that was filmed.)
BTW that episode happened on my birthday.
Quite a lot of people have commented on stuff recently, including saying it to me, and it would be surprising if the reputation for this accommodation is not trashed. Some of those making comments were very angry.
Realistically, this is a mature age person and this should be a safe, a fatherly safe place, for the age group of girls who come here.
That's just a rough guess about what "might have upset the guests"!!
With reviewing the comments above, the focus of the project may now be different.
This person has already been described as a 'filthy sleaze', but also the word whore is appropriate isn't it.
There are a few additional questionable things which relate to what has upset people.
NEW.
The other important factor is that when I booked my return to Mexico,
there was a massive psychic attack from what we are calling the 'Dark Force'. It was very vicious.
This has to be significant - and a resistance to the 'Higher Self'. It has definitely been the tone of the time I spent in Mexico after returning here - although the times before were very dreadful to witness too. But this somehow was the worst. That is how it showed as the attacking Force.
The intention of the BOOK was to be a positive story based on the amazing HIGHER SELF contact by the person.
The negative and bizarre behaviour was never even considered as a way this person would behave. It was a total shock. From the time it was noticed it was covered by this work as drawing attention to the person to be aware of how this looked for the person's reputation.
The 'demon page' which is suggested to read, is the owner talking loudly in public to new guests about how he views his guests and volunteers and what he does.
**Although I stated I don't care what the person is doing, that means I am not interested in it. It does not mean that obvious gutter/skank level behaviour is acceptable, or professional, or should be inflicted on the guests. Nor is it okay that the dog can wander around knocking over the rubbish and peeing everywhere.
*It is not me who is writing reviews or providing comments/complaints to booking websites or whatever else there may be. I have had to stay here! Also I still appreciate that I have been able to stay here. I only did contact Hostelworld the time I found I was completely alone here and everything was in darkness. They happened to agree with me, but I asked them not to follow it up.