. Best viewed on anything but Google

 

 

 

Elysee Palace, Paris, France.

France is a significant world power and presided over the French Empire. It is a country of high culture in literature, music, and the arts. The President of France and his wife the First Lady, are the people 'Candace Owens' is talking down to in her podcasts.

 

Very Possible There Will Be Stricter Restrictions for the Internet

After the issues with Candace Owens. To date she appears unaware of the reality of the lawsuit, and it also seems that her husband is unaware too.

There is also a considerable issue to do with 'comments' such as added next.

These people have most likely only listened to Owens' version, they have not done their own research, or they are brain dead and a danger to society.

“Unconventional relationship?????” Disgusting."

(They will be shaking their fists about this soon.)

"VULGAR !!!!"

"Sickening."

There are endless numbers of these self-righteous comments - which are comments that can only be based on what Candace Owens has presented. Which means misrepresented. People who also do not check the facts, because perhaps they want to say this. This is a quick recap although we already have many pages covering this issue.

Emmanuel Macron was born in 1977. The school provides the date of the play they did and it was May 1993. He was 15. That is when they MET. . Nothing else. Firstly he was of legal age when they met. He was not underage. Secondly, this is the only person she knew like this, and it began as a friendship, but the important thing is they are married and have been for nearly 20 years.

There is no other such connection with anyone else, they remained loyal to each other even though he was sent away to a boarding school in Paris. After he returned and was 29 years old, they married. They are still married.

How is this even remotely a 'pedo' issue that she should be 'jailed' for? (As said in 'comments')

Brigitte was never his teacher in a class. She was the drama coach for an out of school hours theatre group. In addition their connection was looked into by the families and the school when he was 16, nearly 17, and they found nothing wrong or illegal.

It is the LAW that 15 is NOT underage. That is the LAW.

 

Comments continue with people, apparently Americans suggesting that the French do not follow a proper legal system about the issue of age.

Some of the comments are bordering on Americans slandering the French.

The issue of the ages was looked into by the school and the parents and there was nothing illegal. These people went through all of this 30 years ago, and have since moved on in their lives.

It should clearly be stated that it is an opinion that it is a FACT that France is a much more developed, and civilized country that the USA. The slandering of the French by Americans is another worrying issue, and also that it has been triggered by Owens' misrepresenting the facts of this narrative.

UPDATE.

This story is reaching many in the USA mainly, and there is noticable anger about anyone presenting a video who does not agree with Owens.

This again shows how much damage has been done by Owens' influence over others' opinions and their emotions.

We're not going too much into this one. We hope these comments will fade, but many people are fired by this influencer Owens. People who keep making these comments are going to completely finish Owens. This is a huge range of influence (and actually a form of mind control) she has had over these people, and this is very, very damaging. maybe the lawyers will go for more than her husband's wealth. Fact is, Owens did not present the facts. She presented mistruths which benitted her business model - which is also what she is being sued for.

Internet Comments (just 2)

1."I've found LegalEagle's take on it all also quite interesting. Candace doesn't seem to know, that she's probably heading for more costs than she might expect."

2. "I watched the LegalEagle thing on this and while I generally really like him, I felt he was a little dishonest about the evidence. He literally said something like “in what should have been the coup de gras of the conspiracy theory, the legal complaint restates that Brigitte birthed 3 children.” And it’s like…(legalEagle's take is ) look… I believe Brigitte Macron was born a woman because I think a cover up like this would just be too hard to pull off and I don’t think Candace’s evidence amounts to more than a series of coincidences."

HOWEVER, there is not a single photo of Brigitte Macron pregnant, in hospital, or RAISING her three children. Not ONE. So to act like a legal complaint stating that Brigitte Macron gave birth to three children proves that Candace is lying, is just silly!

We have (they have presented) a total of FOUR photos of Brigitte Macron prior to the age of like 36 and none of them are clear enough to obviously be Brigitte Macron. And so while I like LegalEagle’s broader legal analysis, I am just finding myself consistently annoyed that he and everyone else is glossing over the kind of notable lack of good evidence by the Macrons.

But it’s such a weird take for me to have because it’s not that I believe the conspiracy, but it’s also not that I agree with all the people out there rolling their eyes at it (which I felt was legaleagle’s posture)."

Response :

Owens and 'Mind Control"

LegalEagle is covering the legal aspects of this lawsuit. He is diplomatically pointing out that a cover up as suggested would be too hard to pull off. It would also be cleared by legal teams before there was even a trial. The 'conspiracy' aspect works for Owens though.

Owens is a master at influencing how people will think. She is a 'mind controller'.

That is exactly what she does. This is what she has been called out on. Example : Mentioning that Trump should step into this to 'defend American free speech' was an attempt to influence a desired behaviour/response. It is planting the seed of an idea, as if it is the person's own thought. (If you need more of an explanation on that, she is trying to get her fans to call for Trump to intervene for her.)

The consistent misrepresentation of the age difference and actual ages is enough to prove Owens' is guilty of defamation. Even if Brigitte was born a man, Owens has misrepresented the ages and that alone sets off a nightmare trail of additional accusations. Only from that misrepresentation can Owens go off into the pedo aspect, because 15 and 39 is not and was not, underage in France.

Owens misrepresented the age difference again in the very first podcast she did after learning she was being sued.

Part of the reasons you don't have the photos is because Owens chose not to show them. The fact that she didn't show the evidence that was provided is the bigger issue. Although we don't have access to knowledge of what all the evidence that was provided was. Even so Owens is a very lazy 'investigator' she just asks people to send her (a nobody) the evidence. She is the one who is supposed to search for the evidence. Nobody owes her anything.

In fact she is saying, 'if you don't do what I want, I am going to continue to slander you.'

As we have said, we think the strategy might have been to see how far Owens would hang herself, and also take note of all the comments - like this one - that are triggered because of it, to show how much damage Owens has done. So many people think a lack of photos proves Owens is right and the Macrons are 'hiding something' because of that. That gives Owens a bigger support base.

Candace Owens bluffs her way into whatever 'career move' she is doing. She has been called out by people who are smarter than she is.

Her 'intelligence' is a bluff and she has been called out by people who are much smarter than she is. She was also shocked that she has been called out and this has probably not been done before. Perhaps because she has gotten away with her bluff of 'super intelligence' (or whatever) for her entire life, she believes it. Her continuing videos are exposing the truth about 'Candace Owens'.

It is Candace Owens who is being 'exposed' by this lawsuit. She would have done better to keep her mouth shut.

Comments under videos are now mellowing as people realise they can see she is not exctly what she appeared to be.

Candace Owens is married to George Farmer the son of a British aristocrat with a personal wealth around $240 million. He proposed to her after 17 days, they had not dated but he was 'impressed with her intelligence'. They actually then dated for 8 months before they married in August 2019 and have since had 4 children together. George is beginning to come across as something of a Prince Harry level of awareness. His father has already made a public statement that he does not agree with his daughter in law for what she has said about Israel. We need to find the wording for that but it would seem to be a division once again caused by the personality of a misled son's 'difficult' wife.

Owens was aware she was being sued over three weeks ago. She has said that last weekend 'a legal team' quoted their costs for the lawsuit would be about $5 million. The actual costs she is likely to have to come up with will be more than double that to cover the Macron's costs and it is open house for how much they can sue her for damages. Possibly covering her husbands wealth. Possibly much more, we don't know, but it would seem to be a significant amount they can go for in damages.

 

 

Internet Comment : "Where's a photo of Brigitte and her brother TOGETHER .....? or why can't he come out and stand with her bro ?"

This is Brigitte with her brother Jean Michel.

He was at both Presidential inaugurations in 2017 and 2022. He is the only brother still living.

 

 

"Well, being French, I have to try to clarify something. In fact, I expect all Americans to say that Brigitte was Macron's teacher. In fact, no, Brigitte was a literature teacher and Macron was never in her class. On the other hand, she was a leader outside of school hours for a drama club.

This means that she was never his teacher, which is why she was not prosecuted for statutory rape. Her relationship was legal in France."

The lawyers would have established that simple proof before they took on the case, which they intend to win and would look incompetent if they had not checked if Brigitte actually was a man.

 

 

Owens on X. . ... . Rebellion 'Values'. ... . article. + more . ... . Candy Comments (much more to be added.) . ... . President of France Sues Candace Owens ...... Did Candace's husband George Farmer know she was like this when he married her?. ... . 'Project Sitting Duck' '. .....The Macrons are Not the 'Elite''. ... ... Brigitte. Macron ........Macrons v Owens ..continues here. ........ .'Defamation'. ... .... . Video Comments on the Investigation Article.

 

 

 

 

   Plant Food Natural Health          Contact  

 Copyright 2003 - Disclaimer  www.Soul-Search.org

 

 

 

 Copyright 2015Disclaimer  www.Soul-Search.org