. Best viewed on anything but Google

Piers Morgan Says “You’ve Been DUPED!” To Candace Owens’ Face!

*We are just following this now to see when Owens realises the interpretation that Macrons already know Brigitte is a woman.

Current video is a review from the earlier interview with Piers Morgan. Or it maybe a follow on new interview. Its earlier. Now checked. From what she is wearing it's an interview from about a week ago given that this is Sunday Aug. 17th. This matters because after this has been pointed out to her, her recent videos are still on the same attack. This is probably because she has missed the initial point Piers presented, and also because she doesn't research. She just relies on people sending her information. Her recent video has written on it "Either they destroy me, or I destroy it". So she still has not considered that they are suing her for real.

Candace thinks she's on to a story about an 'elite pedo network' that has been able to 'be above the law' and she is going to blow it wide open. This is why she believes she deserves the Pultitzer Prize. And because she is "on to this story"' of the "biggest cover up of all time", believes she's on her way to beig the biggest name in journalism on the planet.

So two points from the initial bit I have seen of this 6 minute video.

Owens answers Piers by saying an incorrect reporting that "Macron got on a plane to visit Trump to beg him to stop her reporting". This is a huge misrepresentation but maybe she has made this a real thing in her head. Macron had an official visit to DC earlier to discuss issues they need to discuss. He didn't get on a plane to beg Trump to ask this person to stop reporting. However, Owens does have a hugely unrealistic view of her own importance. Macron did ask Trump to do something about it as an addition to what he was there for. Probably having had the US President ignored by Owens also helps the Macron's case. Owens misses important details.

Secondly Piers is pointing out in the first sentences, that all the Macrons need to do is the DNA test. Piers clearly says that that is the reason they are coming after Owens, because they know they can prove she is wrong. Owens misunderstands this and answers 'it sounds like you're on our side'. Owens has misunderstood that the Macrons are doing this because they KNOW they can prove this. Owens should have realized this before continuing. Now they really can sue her. She is also trying to promote her Brigitte series via this interview. No-one needs to see the series because it makes no difference. It is issues such as the Macrons HAVE sued her for, and because, as we have always said, they do KNOW Brigitte is 'most likely' a woman. Piers is right, Owens was duped, and he presents sensible observations.

I would suggest that Xavier Proussard is making a killing with his book because of Candace Owens doing what she is doing, and it is only Owens who can be sued. There is also a possibility, allegedly, that the two women, (who were not journalists as Owens said they were) and the book author Proussard, there is a possibility that maybe these 3 people already knew each other?

Watch, 6 mins. Uploaded 11 hours ago.

The photos of Brigitte at the school mostly don't look very nice, not attractive at all.

The family likeness though, is similar to the 10 year old boy Jean Michel. But in 1993 JM would have been 48 years old. His birthday is in February The photos are much younger than someone who is 48. .Brigitte would have been 40 years old in April 1993. The rehearsals for the play the drama group was doing began before that, so she was 39 when they met. As a comparison, actress Scarlett Johansson is 40 years old. Brigitte did look similar to her, and there are plenty of 15 year old boys who would like to date Scarlett Johansson.

When this comes to trial, or its finale, we believe the Macron's lawyer will begin with providing the DNA result to the judge and possibly calling Jean Michel Trogneaux as the first witness, or something of that kind. This is almost all they need to do, but certainly to start out with. The DNA result and the presence of the brother. Beyond that they may begin on what they are seeking damages for. Perhaps the amount has already been given to Owen's side.

The two issues Owens was basing just about everything on is Brigitte being a man, and in fact being the brother Jean Michel. The next issue is the ages, which were proveably legal and within French Law. With these things established, there was no 'pedophilia' and obviously no 'incest' as the lawyers will have provided the DNA result from the begining. As there was nothing amiss anywhere then being somehow complicit in murders to try to hide this also has no foundation. As for a network of pedos, there is absolutely nothing to warrant making such an accusation, certainly not connected to the Macrons in their lives.

After that the question is did the Macrons provide enough to show Brigitte was a woman and born a woman? Then they have to establish that what Owens did was continue with a reckless disregard for the truth.

The next things will be all the damage that Owens has done by accusing the Macrons of all these things, and that cannot be denied, because she has done that, and continued with it.

Plant Food Natural Health Contact