Duke of Kent. < - > Prince Michael of Kent. 
The reality is that the founding and establishment of the US
was a FREEMASON project.
The War of Independence was a war between Freemason control and the British crown.
There are some royals who are masons, but back in 1776, the only royals who were masons were in opposition to the King who was not a Freemason
In today's time, Prince Edward of Kent is the Grand Master of the Masonic Lodge in the UK, possibly the head one of all of them, because the man on the left is the one always shown in photographs. Some lesser connected royals are Masons, and this shows the infiltration of the UK. But Edward looks like a Rothschild and the photos of Prince Michael do not look like that.
Prince Edward has the same head shape, and look like the Rothschilds. The brothers are cousins of the late Queen, and there have to be questions why one of them looks like a Rothschild.
But it isn't the 'British', it is the Freemasons doing this, and they are the ones who created the USA taking it from the British who were not Masons.
HISTORY. The American War of Independence was under King George lll who was NOT a mason.
He was attacked from within and declared insane, which left the way for his son to become the Prince Regent then George lV.
Right there you have where the UK was infiltrated and where the USA came under the control of the Freemasons.
George lll was not mad. He was poisoned.
As Prince Regent George lV, his son, was the defacto king until he became the king in 1820. He was succeeded by William lV who was also a Mason.
The next royal to become a Mason was Edward Vll who was the son of Queen Victoria, and she was the monarch who succeeded William 1V.
King George V is not mentioned as a Freemason but his sons King Edward Vlll was a mason - and that may explain why he abdicated because he was ordered to - and also his brother who became King George Vl. He was Queen Elizabeth's father.
So, we can see, the royals were attacked and infiltrated in the last quarter of the 1700's with the son of the King ousting his father and taking control of the throne.
Today, only 3 royals are acknolwedged to be Masons. One is Prince Edward, Duke of Kent. and he is the most senior Freemason in the royal family. He is the one shown in the photos.
Also there is his brother Prince Michael who appears to be high in the order and if that is the case, he ranks higher than the monarch because of this. Not publically higher, but within this secret order 'of the craft'. The craft is the alignment into the false source, just in case you didn't know. Prince Michael seems to be the name most seen as the most important Grand Master, but it is Edward, the Duke of Kent, his older brother who is always shown as the top mason.
The other royal was Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh who is said not to have had a great interest in it. However, he was singled out as suitale to be the husband of the young Princess Elizabeth before she became the Queen, by his uncle Earl Louis Mountbatten. The Prince and Princess of Wales' youngest son is named after him. Earl Mountbatten was not a Freemason.
With the American War of Independence, this was clearly a land grab by the Freemasons as part of a long game plan taking shape today. The Freemasons won. At that time certain royals were part of this. But not all royals.
It looks like the altered Constitution after the American Civil War 1865 may have been to remove the Masons. The British monarch at that time was not a Freemason.
Therefore, those saying the 1776 Constitution was correct maybe the Masonic side giving out that information, and the 1865 may in reality, be the 'good side'.
Was Abraham Lincoln a Freemason?
Answer: " It is often said (incorrectly) that Abraham Lincoln was a Freemason. The records are very clear--Lincoln was not a Freemason."
maybe that adds an answer to what was going on.
Whatever the story and the history, the USA needs to be corrected.
|